(Critical!) Bring back 128 players in conquest large mode

[Heartbeach]

Seriously, I really demand 128 players in conquest large mode. Seriously, Battlefield’s sequel has to have 128 players in conquest large mode, either, inevitably.

[Heartbeach]

Seriously, they have to allow us to start a match with 127ai instantly after starting official 128 conquest large mode, if there are no real players waiting in lobby (Number of real players to start a match is 1 (head of the lobby), extreme serious waiting time of players is solved. Seriously, and also, they have to allow us to get in an official match that other player has started with ai instantly too, when I start 128 player mode of conquest large mode for no extreme serious waiting time of players.

[Dagre]

Originally posted by Heartbeach:

Seriously, I really demand 128 players in conquest large mode. Seriously, Battlefield’s sequel has to have 128 players in conquest large mode, either, inevitably.

obviously not. besides, 128 is just a zerg fest. bring back 128 maps with 64 players, for sure. that would feel more like bf2's dragon valley map instead of this constant action thing they're going for cause, you know, gotta compete with call of duty.

[Heartbeach]

Originally posted by Dagre:

Originally posted by Heartbeach:

Seriously, I really demand 128 players in conquest large mode. Seriously, Battlefield’s sequel has to have 128 players in conquest large mode, either, inevitably.

obviously not. besides, 128 is just a zerg fest. bring back 128 maps with 64 players, for sure. that would feel more like bf2's dragon valley map instead of this constant action thing they're going for cause, you know, gotta compete with call of duty.

From 128 to 64, that would be downfall in player numbers in development, seriously. Seriously, it should be 32 to 64 to 128 to 256 to … . Why were they downgrading the game, seriously? Critically, they have to add most supreme devastations, more supreme devastations, supreme devastations, devastations, nuclear weapon(s), water vehicles, and map(s) that water vehicles can be used.

[Heartbeach]

Seriously, stop downgrading Battlefield 2042 and sequel, come on.

[Heartbeach]

Seriously, whoever is bringing Battlefield 2042 and sequel 128 to 64 players in conquest large mode, you are destroying and killing Battlefield 2042 and sequel, assuredly.

[triten82]

I played 128 today and last night it is back

[Heartbeach]

Originally posted by triten82:

I played 128 today and last night it is back

Really? Official 128, not 128 in portal, right?

[Dagre]

Originally posted by Heartbeach:

Originally posted by Dagre:

obviously not. besides, 128 is just a zerg fest. bring back 128 maps with 64 players, for sure. that would feel more like bf2's dragon valley map instead of this constant action thing they're going for cause, you know, gotta compete with call of duty.

From 128 to 64, that would be downfall in player numbers in development, seriously. Seriously, it should be 32 to 64 to 128 to 256 to … . Why were they downgrading the game, seriously? Critically, they have to add most supreme devastations, more supreme devastations, supreme devastations, devastations, nuclear weapon(s), water vehicles, and map(s) that water vehicles can be used.

planetside been there done that. once you go 128+ its just a zerg fest. planetside 2 is there for that(300vs300vs300) nonsense, it isn't that interesting. i mean, there's constant action and if you camp instead of push you'll get ridiculous kills but that's about all there is to do cause every main capture is just spawn death for 30 mins unless you camp

[󠀡󠀡]

Seriously, nope. Stop spamming.

[Heartbeach]

Originally posted by 󠀡󠀡:

Seriously, nope. Stop spamming.

Seriously, stop destroying Battlefield.

[Heartbeach]

Originally posted by Dagre:

Originally posted by Heartbeach:

From 128 to 64, that would be downfall in player numbers in development, seriously. Seriously, it should be 32 to 64 to 128 to 256 to … . Why were they downgrading the game, seriously? Critically, they have to add most supreme devastations, more supreme devastations, supreme devastations, devastations, nuclear weapon(s), water vehicles, and map(s) that water vehicles can be used.

planetside been there done that. once you go 128+ its just a zerg fest. planetside 2 is there for that(300vs300vs300) nonsense, it isn't that interesting. i mean, there's constant action and if you camp instead of push you'll get ridiculous kills but that's about all there is to do cause every main capture is just spawn death for 30 mins unless you camp

What were you explaining about?

[Jake 🦇]

I think they only take away 128 conquest when they replace it with rush xl (128), because now that rush xl isn't available, it's now 128 conquest again... and no, not portal.

[Heartbeach]

Originally posted by Jake 🦇:

I think they only take away 128 conquest when they replace it with rush xl (128), because now that rush xl isn't available, it's now 128 conquest again... and no, not portal.

Okay.

[𝔓𝔲𝔰𝔥𝔶]

There are those who say that our gameplay depends and is based on statistics, that our ability within matches is calculated by them, if that is the case, whoever doesn't give a damn about statistics is really screwed in the game, and to improve them is even worse, or start flying planes when they are available in the game or spend your life trying, in more than 500 online matches I still haven't been able to fly a plane, every time I get to the match menu everything is busy, even the tanks, so I gave up on play with both and unlock, I play just on the ground, even on 128x128 this happens , I pretend that aircraft and tanks do not exist in the game even though they do exist

[azmuth]

I could definitely live with that ... lol