Battlefield 6 is the easiest game to make

[TipsyDipsy]

Battlefield 4.5, no operators, classic battlefield class system, prints money

[TheSkunkyMonk]

No unlocking weapons or attachments, just straight up equal competitive play from the start.

[[ACPL] Jon]

Originally posted by TheSkunkyMonk:

No unlocking weapons or attachments, just straight up equal competitive play from the start.

How to prove you have no idea what you're talking about.

Originally posted by TipsyDipsy:

Battlefield 4.5, no operators, classic battlefield class system, prints money

Only if it retains tech from BF 2042, also limiting to 64 players is a mistake, they should do at least 40v40 or 50v50. There also needs to be an even tighter leash for the artists regarding cosmetics so most of the skins won't end up with bright elements.

It's war ffs, noone wants to give up his position and somehow we get more and more skins with flashy orange or neon green. It's not CoD, in BF such skins get you owned.

[DIMITRI]

i always liked unlocking weapons and attachments.......
Its a fun way to play every weapon and try everything the game has to offer gameplay wise

[SHUGO]

Unlocking weapons and attachments either by just earning kills or completing challenges was one of my favourite things to do in Battlefield 3 and 4. And as [ACPL] Jon_Gra_TTV said, it's a war, a BATTLEFIELD, so no COD-like skins, no operators and no, or at least way less, female soldiers. Battlefield 3, 4 and 1 also had the best voice acting in my opinion, where the callouts sounded really good.

[twitchie1]

they will have always have skins because that creates more money the idea isnt making a great game the idea is selling garbage to people who continue to buy the garbage... Like my close personal friend jordan belfort says he was selling garbage to garbage men and making money hand over fist.

simplicity is more imo i think everyone can agree having 30 different attachments per gun is stupid having some unlocks is cool but at least make it so the T1 skin and unlocks are only done through PVP not PVE garbage people grinding out T1 skins for everything on Bot farms its a joke it makes the real t1 players who grinded real PVP kills well its nothing special any mouth breather can get it

[Max Shadow]

I mean, If I wanted BF4, I would just play BF4. It's still pretty active. I don't really get the hate for BF2042 (although I haven't played it at launch). Skins are kinda annoying, but to be honest, the only time I really see them is before a match starts and after it ends. The skills of each operator are pretty cool, I hope they keep that. The only thing I would like is going back to unnamed generic characters. Sell skins all you want, but please get rid of the cringy voice lines.

[Max Shadow]

Originally posted by twitchie1:

simplicity is more imo i think everyone can agree having 30 different attachments per gun is stupid having some unlocks is cool but at least make it so the T1 skin and unlocks are only done through PVP not PVE garbage people grinding out T1 skins for everything on Bot farms its a joke it makes the real t1 players who grinded real PVP kills well its nothing special any mouth breather can get it

I don't agree with this at all. Having more weapon and attachment variety is always good, as you can always choose not to use them all. However, some unlock requirements were pretty annoying and tedious to do in PVP, so I'm very glad that they can be unlocked in PVE. I couldn't care less about flexing my unlocks, I just want to have fun. Unlocking gameplay elements should not be a luxury. If you want to flex, then do it with skins, not weapons, vehicles or attachments.

[[BLK] Telu]

EA want to make money, so, it's not sure than they will be interested into giving what the community want.

[Max Shadow]

Originally posted by BLK Telu:

EA want to make money, so, it's not sure than they will be interested into giving what the community want.

Making the community happy is part of making money. I'm pretty sure the bad reviews of the game at launch had a huge impact in sales, and they attempted to improve the game over time. Of course there were some design flaws that could not be "fixed", but I'm confident they won't do everything wrong with the next game.

[[BLK] Telu]

They are acting like Bethesda with their "Players don't understand us". So, there is a big fear about what BF6 will be.

We all want BF3/BF4 experience again. But maybe EA have other project in mind.

[TipsyDipsy]

Originally posted by BLK Telu:

They are acting like Bethesda with their "Players don't understand us". So, there is a big fear about what BF6 will be.

We all want BF3/BF4 experience again. But maybe EA have other project in mind.

EA project is simple to milk and squeeze dry a legendary game franchise until DICE is no more, let's be honest the DICE devs from Battlefield 3 and 4 are no longer at the company so even though it's the easiest title to make in my opinion I don't have any faith in this new team to deliver

[Delicia Suprema]

I hope EA collapses so that an indie dev makes battlefield.

[Cookie Crisp Cereal]

Originally posted by TipsyDipsy:

Battlefield 4.5, no operators, classic battlefield class system, prints money

Battlefield 4 is not a classic battlefield system.
That's Battlefield 2 or Bad Company.

[Shaken_Widow]

Originally posted by I Am Alpharius:

Originally posted by TipsyDipsy:

Battlefield 4.5, no operators, classic battlefield class system, prints money

Battlefield 4 is not a classic battlefield system.
That's Battlefield 2 or Bad Company.

except literally everyone on the forums and the developers themselves call bf3 and bf4 the classic bf experience and that is what the devs have stated they are returning too.

bad company 1-2 was amazing sure, but it in no way was the best experience, it had major issues with clunkyness and terrible animations that would end in people dying from failing to do something like jump over a wall, (you couldn't vault,)

[MorgooN7]

Basically BF3 2.0