Screen size for BF ?

[Kazedal]

I'm actually on a 24 - AOC - 144hz, is it good for that kind of game ? What do you have ?

[Edifier]

Well yeah, if you can run the game at 144 FPS it'll be lovely.

Also such screen is good for any game.

[𝕊𝕃𝕊𝔸𝕄𝔾♔]

I think if you're competitive 24" is probably the perfect sweet spot for 1080p. 27" for 1440p.

My days of playing full on competitively are over so I use a 34" 1440p 120hz ultrawide.

[Kazedal]

Originally posted by eLucID:

I think if you're competitive 24" is probably the perfect sweet spot for 1080p. 27" for 1440p.

My days of playing full on competitively are over so I use a 34" 1440p 120hz ultrawide.

That what I was thinking about ... to buy a 27 - 1440p :)

[Amadeus]

38 inch ultrawide

[DarkBlueAgent]

28 inch 60hz 4K here.

Can't help myself I prefer quality.

[Shork]

27 inch on 1080p? Not really good if you're close and want a mostly aliasing free experience. Like in general, not just for Battlefield.
Though with 144Hz you have a good standard for the refresh rate. Although Battlefield is more casual in comparison to some other shooters, you definitely still want that refresh rate and a frame rate to back it up. That is much more important than fidelity. Especially since the fast paced gameplay is gonna keep your busy enough to not look for details.

[⎛⎝Duckers McQuack⎠⎞]

27 inch 1440p 144hz, or if i wanna be bold, i'll go triple monitor, or bold V2, portrait surround for a "makeshift" 50 inch 4.5k.

[Kazedal]

Originally posted by deleted:

27 inch on 1080p? Not really good if you're close and want a mostly aliasing free experience. Like in general, not just for Battlefield.
Though with 144Hz you have a good standard for the refresh rate. Although Battlefield is more casual in comparison to some other shooters, you definitely still want that refresh rate and a frame rate to back it up. That is much more important than fidelity. Especially since the fast paced gameplay is gonna keep your busy enough to not look for details.

Originally posted by ⎛⎝Duckers⎠⎞:

27 inch 1440p 144hz, or if i wanna be bold, i'll go triple monitor, or bold V2, portrait surround for a "makeshift" 50 inch 4.5k.

Sorry it was a mistake, I have a second screen 27 but my main is 24 " - 144hz

[Shork]

Originally posted by Starboy:

Sorry it was a mistake, I have a second screen 27 but my main is 24 " - 144hz

That's standard then.
But yeah, up to you and your wallet.
Driving more than 1080p at 120 FPS or more is gonna become a lot rougher, naturally.

[Swoleberg]

oled tv > monitor

[Shork]

Originally posted by acRylz:

oled tv > monitor

I'd say generally incorrect, but the statement is too vague to even gain anything from it in the first place.
In what situation? What monitor (refresh rate, response time, panel type, exact model)?
For still images, a good OLED TV will beat any other monitor in existence, yes (until burn-in kicks in someday).
For gaming, that's a whole different story. OLEDs are actually quite damn horrible when it comes to black transitions. Even worse than VA panels.
Going from black to anything else will cause significant ghosting, or "smearing" since the time it takes to switch the LED back on is significant. This is also one reason phones come with white/light themes by default, despite that being counterproductive for battery and display life.
Assuming you play anything that has any sort of black elements to it, and that's most games, it'll actually be detrimental to your experience.

[𝕊𝕃𝕊𝔸𝕄𝔾♔]

Originally posted by acRylz:

oled tv > monitor

Yeah no. Not for gaming. For film watching absolutely.

[Shinshe]

27 is the best size for gaming 1440p 4k or 2k and oled tv u have 1 option only thats fast respond 48 inch LG cx 120fps cap

[jeffpmaxs6]

19" crt