Why no 128 anymore?

[weedy.gonzales]

I play 64 vs. 64 exclusively. Now, there is no 64 vs. 64 anymore. What is going on? Seriously?

[Huxley]

I agree developers should stop trying to define the players gaming experience, i only play 128 ,now i don't play.

[Ruieurope - Europa_Teles_BTR]

64 vs 64 again please

Conquest of Ages again please

[weedy.gonzales]

Thank you, EA! It's back again.

[ArAweLnINA]

it didn't pay off for them. :/ too little engangement overall

[♢︎♢︎♢︎♢]

Originally posted by 𝔓𝔲𝔰𝔥𝔶:

It returned

128 is back?

[Rekutor]

Originally posted by 𝔓𝔲𝔰𝔥𝔶:

If we go from another point of view, the maps are large and with 128 players it is the best for new BF players to evolve their gameplay and skills, even if it is mixed matches with bots there is a mix that forces new players to be more active in the matches , maps with 64 players are good for later because they are more leisurely and then new players can put into practice what they acquired on the 128 servers when they are more familiar with the game system as if it were an open multiplayer training ground , I can be more active on a server 128 than on a server 64, on server 64 I can go have a coffee and some toast and come back lol
- I've been playing 64..and in the parties it seems like I don't see anyone 😅 the maps are big and beautiful but they seem empty 😁 they're good for playing as a team we have more time and space, 128 good for training with other players and bots

as a former new player.
128 was pain for me