90% CPU Usage after update

[Mašinka Tomáš]

Same fps, but 90% CPU USAGE, gg wp
RTX 3060 TI
Ryzen 5 5600


Guys yes cpu usage is higher than before, BUT!!! Perfomance is better than before and fps more stable. I dont have problem with input lag or anythink different

[tiegh]

my guess is they couldnt get the game to run well so they just made it use ur whole cpu to run "better" at the expense of ur hardware

pretty epic if u ask me

[Viking2121]

Цитата допису 󠀡󠀡󠀡⁧⁧francis:

my guess is they couldnt get the game to run well so they just made it use ur whole cpu to run "better" at the expense of ur hardware

pretty epic if u ask me

Battlefields have always consumed a godly amount of CPU, I really don't see this one being any different other than it never use to use my 5900x as much as it does now, use to play around 40 - 50% utilization, now it never drops below 90% lol.

It would be different if the game actually preformed better I wouldn't care but such a high CPU usage, Its a pretty bad experience a lot of the times, its just not smooth.

But this is expected form EA, probably take them 4 years to get the game into decent state like they did with BF4.

[Gisborne]

Цитата допису Viking2121:

Цитата допису 󠀡󠀡󠀡⁧⁧francis:

my guess is they couldnt get the game to run well so they just made it use ur whole cpu to run "better" at the expense of ur hardware

pretty epic if u ask me

Battlefields have always consumed a godly amount of CPU, I really don't see this one being any different other than it never use to use my 5900x as much as it does now, use to play around 40 - 50% utilization, now it never drops below 90% lol.

It would be different if the game actually preformed better I wouldn't care but such a high CPU usage, Its a pretty bad experience a lot of the times, its just not smooth.

But this is expected form EA, probably take them 4 years to get the game into decent state like they did with BF4.

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

[Gisborne]

Цитата допису Andrew ꑭ | #StandWithUkraine:

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

It's a ROBLOX game

What does texture quality have to do with CPU calculations? Because BF runs the same for me on MIN or Max GFX, STILL cpu BOTTLENECK and insane unplayable lag... So the fact a 3 man roblox dev team made a multiplayer game with more realism than battlefield and over double the players with zero lag is embarrassing for DICE.

[Gisborne]

Цитата допису Andrew ꑭ | #StandWithUkraine:

Цитата допису Gisborne:

What does texture quality have to do with CPU calculations? Because BF runs the same for me on MIN or Max GFX, STILL cpu BOTTLENECK and insane unplayable lag... So the fact a 3 man roblox dev team made a multiplayer game with more realism than battlefield and over double the players with zero lag is embarrassing for DICE.

CPU does the calculations GPU renders them.

6 blocks 2 legs 2 arms torso and head ( 6 poligons ) are easy to render, even an pentium 4 can run a ROBLOX game .....
And a bf 2042 character has millions of polligons , even a FLAG has more polligons than a ROBLOX game and all of it's maps

So why does BF run like ♥♥♥♥ on min or max gfx if gpu affects the cpu? why is my CPU capped at 100% and lagging? yet my gpu is at 20% usage?

[FalloutBoy21]

i run R7 5800X and usage is around 70/80% and temps run from 75 c to 88 c, have some liquid cooling installed

[Viking2121]

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Цитата допису Viking2121:

Battlefields have always consumed a godly amount of CPU, I really don't see this one being any different other than it never use to use my 5900x as much as it does now, use to play around 40 - 50% utilization, now it never drops below 90% lol.

It would be different if the game actually preformed better I wouldn't care but such a high CPU usage, Its a pretty bad experience a lot of the times, its just not smooth.

But this is expected form EA, probably take them 4 years to get the game into decent state like they did with BF4.

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

Do you think player count has a direct impact on CPU performance? Hate to break it to ya, but the engines are just not even close to being the same, Battlebit has much less it has to render on the client side than Battlefield, its not comparable in the slightest.

[аговнумыч]

Цитата допису Tomas:

Same fps, but 90% CPU USAGE, gg wp
RTX 3060 TI
Ryzen 5 5600


Guys yes cpu usage is higher than before, BUT!!! Perfomance is better than before and fps more stable. I dont have problem with input lag or anythink different

[Jez]

Цитата допису FalloutBoy21:

i run R7 5800X and usage is around 70/80% and temps run from 75 c to 88 c, have some liquid cooling installed

i run the 5800x3d getting slightly lower measures on the wraith prism, meanwhile i've also tried disabling CPU Boost and it lowers the temp about 20 degrees and doesn't affect performance

[OzyMan👽]

this thread is still pinned, what a SHAME

[Jez]

Цитата допису Viking2121:

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

Do you think player count has a direct impact on CPU performance?

yes, on an old cpu running borderline 100% the fps was significantly higher when the match was half-full

[MadHamster]

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Цитата допису Viking2121:

Battlefields have always consumed a godly amount of CPU, I really don't see this one being any different other than it never use to use my 5900x as much as it does now, use to play around 40 - 50% utilization, now it never drops below 90% lol.

It would be different if the game actually preformed better I wouldn't care but such a high CPU usage, Its a pretty bad experience a lot of the times, its just not smooth.

But this is expected form EA, probably take them 4 years to get the game into decent state like they did with BF4.

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

There is stupid, very stupid, ultra stupid and then there is this guys comment.

[Gisborne]

Цитата допису MadHamster:

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

There is stupid, very stupid, ultra stupid and then there is this guys comment.

Bf 64 player my cpu at 100% to the point game locks down and lags, battlebit 256 players no lag cpu not at 100% and gpu barely anything.

"There are various attributes of a game that can contribute to it being more CPU intensive than other titles, including: Genre of the game (strategy, MMO, and sims tend to be more CPU heavy) Multiplayer games can be CPU heavy (more players means more processing and sending of network code)"

[Gisborne]

Цитата допису Viking2121:

Цитата допису Gisborne:

Battlebit uses far less CPU and has 250+ players with 0 lag...

Do you think player count has a direct impact on CPU performance? Hate to break it to ya, but the engines are just not even close to being the same, Battlebit has much less it has to render on the client side than Battlefield, its not comparable in the slightest.

There are various attributes of a game that can contribute to it being more CPU intensive than other titles, including: Genre of the game (strategy, MMO, and sims tend to be more CPU heavy) Multiplayer games can be CPU heavy (more players means more processing and sending of network code)

[~Sound Sage~]

are there any fixes for this yet? i have a Ryzen 5 7600x, and it runs hot as it is. makes me afraid to play if its going to max out my cpu usage.