Your 2042 rating at the moment...

[BloodyPilum]

If the game came out today, in it's current condition out of /10 what would you give it? Feel free to add any comments to your score also. Thanks.

[Kilgin]

Messaggio originale di NoobiK:

3/10

Interesting, giving a 3/10 on a game you played over 200 hours on, what's the deal?

[ReLoAdeD91]

It's simple ... THIS ISN'T A BATTLEFIELD GAME -10 score

[Mr.Stoj]

7 out of 10 at the moment, it is looking to be that way until its life cycle runs out.

[DB]

3/10

[DuCkYdEaLeR]

Messaggio originale di GhostHawk196:

If it wasn’t called Battlefield 6/10, in the presence of titans such as Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3,4 and 1 - this game is a 0/10

+1

[|||-Landi-|||]

6/10 Shooter game
2/10 Battlefield game

[CyberOni]

Messaggio originale di Chill-Out-Zone:

Maybe in a year or two cause playing this game on a GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB), i7 6700 K 4.2 GHz and 32 GB DDR4 isn't enough.
(60 FPS on low)

This is pure ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ I have a GTX 1080Ti and 32g of ram and play on high with my fps rarely dropping below 70 and that is on 2560x1440 your CPU is less powerful though since I have a I7 8700k

[P1nkLem0n4d3]

This game is rather rough. Like, there are a little bit of redeeming qualities out of it, but a metric ton of issues.

I liked the 128 breakthrough and conquest, I liked some aspects of portal with some of the modes, some of which got removed entirely.

But weapons? Finding matches? Maps? Modes? Specialists? Balance? Technical state? Vehicles? Gadgets? Movement and gameplay in general? Netcode? Anti-cheat doing nothing against cheaters? Content? Season pass? Customization in general? Performance? Missing features from previous battlefield games? Leveling system? Overpriced? Everything else about the game is a huge downgrade from previous battlefield games.

This is honestly, like a 1/10.

[burthole]

I don't want to rate it 1-10 but I'll say that I rather play this than the previous titles.

BF4 servers use fake populations and are empty half of the time so unless I want to play world war games this is a fun option.

[Rakuzan]

Messaggio originale di BloodyPilum:

If the game came out today, in it's current condition out of /10 what would you give it? Feel free to add any comments to your score also. Thanks.

bought the game on season 1 for 30euros and was worth
i can give it a 7/10
-bad spawns (sometimes u will get spawned in a complety flat area with 0 cover)
-variety of maps (we need infantry maps , naval maps)
-impossible to change squad
-vehicle category (why is bolte in the same category with the tank when u can take the bolte crew with just a gun , jets with helies aswell.. )
-lack of vehicles (we get less vehicles for 64players per team than bf4 had for 32players per team)

+gun play (we lack guns but most of them are good and fun to play with , compared to bf4 where everyone was using aek )
+128 players per server (i bought battlefield cuz i enjoyed mayhem and this one got more mayhem )
+specialists (im a solo player so i hated class restrictions , i prefer specialists cuz i can be one man army )

[Rakuzan]

Messaggio originale di Chill-Out-Zone:

Maybe in a year or two cause playing this game on a GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB), i7 6700 K 4.2 GHz and 32 GB DDR4 isn't enough.
(60 FPS on low)

the problem is ur cpu , is very old(6generations behind) and outdate for games with high cpu usage . i got gtx 1070 ryzen 7 5700g 32gb ram and i have 80fps

[Cryptic Draugr]

I would say 6/10 for the full 128 player maps as not enough maps are remade to make the full 128 player conquest really worth it. Though Exposure and the remade Kaleidoscope are both really good.

7/10 for the 64 player modes. It still feels too much like cod with people jumping and pre-firing around corners, sliding, jump shotting, etc. etc.

Fix the optimization and remake all the launch maps to work better and put a bigger focus on infantry combat vs vehicle combat and I would say it's a solid 8/10. I kinda got over the specialists and just kinda deal with it now so it's not really a negative for me anymore, really just in-between on it now. they're not great, but they're not terrible either.

Add in more destruction like BF1 for example and i'll bump it to a 9/10 along with the above changes.

[Cryptic Draugr]

Messaggio originale di 76561198117219941:

Messaggio originale di BloodyPilum:

If the game came out today, in it's current condition out of /10 what would you give it? Feel free to add any comments to your score also. Thanks.

bought the game on season 1 for 30euros and was worth
i can give it a 7/10
-bad spawns (sometimes u will get spawned in a complety flat area with 0 cover)
-variety of maps (we need infantry maps , naval maps)
-impossible to change squad
-vehicle category (why is bolte in the same category with the tank when u can take the bolte crew with just a gun , jets with helies aswell.. )
-lack of vehicles (we get less vehicles for 64players per team than bf4 had for 32players per team)

+gun play (we lack guns but most of them are good and fun to play with , compared to bf4 where everyone was using aek )
+128 players per server (i bought battlefield cuz i enjoyed mayhem and this one got more mayhem )
+specialists (im a solo player so i hated class restrictions , i prefer specialists cuz i can be one man army )

Why are bolte's with tanks? because people were using bolte's like tanks so they grouped them together so teams cant spam bolte's with 30mm cannons and just decimate the game. The same reason why the littlebird is now with the attack choppers.

[Rakuzan]

Messaggio originale di Smooth Brain:

Messaggio originale di 76561198117219941:

bought the game on season 1 for 30euros and was worth
i can give it a 7/10
-bad spawns (sometimes u will get spawned in a complety flat area with 0 cover)
-variety of maps (we need infantry maps , naval maps)
-impossible to change squad
-vehicle category (why is bolte in the same category with the tank when u can take the bolte crew with just a gun , jets with helies aswell.. )
-lack of vehicles (we get less vehicles for 64players per team than bf4 had for 32players per team)

+gun play (we lack guns but most of them are good and fun to play with , compared to bf4 where everyone was using aek )
+128 players per server (i bought battlefield cuz i enjoyed mayhem and this one got more mayhem )
+specialists (im a solo player so i hated class restrictions , i prefer specialists cuz i can be one man army )

Why are bolte's with tanks? because people were using bolte's like tanks so they grouped them together so teams cant spam bolte's with 30mm cannons and just decimate the game. The same reason why the littlebird is now with the attack choppers.

they can make them a special category , they are extremly weak compared to a tank , u dont even need explo to take the bolte crew... , or buff them , make that stupid window buletproof , now is just a wasted vehicle with 0 usage

[kevinjs]

Needs more maps. Then it will be worth playing