Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
I'm trying to side with you here..
I had only suggesting checking because, Well.. I've been pc gaming for years and as I said, other perfectly legitimate software has gotten players banned in the past, So I tend to first check via a Google search if x interacts with y, if yes.. don't load "x".. thus the possibility of an unwanted interaction is removed..
For all I know, running furmark while playing 2042 could trigger it, I wouldn't know.. unless I checked first..
I dont shill, btw.. im just a gamer like you with a fancy name color and a little extra functionality on these forums.. that's it.
I'm not suggesting he check the interactions of everything installed on his pc with an anticheat.. that would be absurd..
What I DID suggest, was to check the interaction of one specific software that is designed by the keyboard / mouse manufacturers themselves , that it doesn't falsely trigger anything that can result in a ban.
What we all have to understand is that after the failings of the anticheat in bfv, its not surprising that EAC is the anticheat used In 2042 as it appears to cast a wider net and snag more cheaters.. which is good!
The only problem is that if Epic Games ( the devs of EAC ) has discovered certain software to allow others to gain an advantage over other players, it also means that software has been blacklisted.
IMHO I don't think it should straight up ban a user, I think it should be a violation kick and a warning on screen telling you to close x because it clashes.
The AC could potentially see it that way if you're using ghub to do it instead of the ingame options menu.
It's only a guess though.
I don't know how you can say that them not researching the official software for their mouse isn't blaming them. Software that is literally step 2 of using the mouse, and without installing the mouse actually has buttons that have no default binding.
Did you do research on your graphics drivers when you first installed them, or did you just click next until they were installed, and update them on occasion? Or are you using the Microsoft default drivers, which are horribly inefficient and outdated?
You do realize Logitech programable mice for the last decade or so can write the macros to the mouse itself, and the mouse can use that configuration on any computer even without the software installed? The software is not sending the commands.
WQHL Graphics drivers are usually signed by 2 ( soon to be 3 ) of the largest GPU tech giants so it's not relevant really, At least in the grand scheme of things.
Of course you can also install unsigned drivers ( those may actually cause issues if the contents have been modified to run on older hardware that the original drivers no longer supports )
Similarly, I've heard of people catching bans from using PS3 controller drivers from software like Motioninjoy, again, That uses unsigned drivers IIRC so there's always that to consider ( unsigned drivers I mean )
I wouldn't know, I haven't ever used a programmable mouse.
but that opens up a different can of fish doesn't it? could it be the actual physical mouse that is being detected and banned or what?
And that comment on unsigned drivers is a red herring at best, the ghub software and it's predecessor are signed by logitech, one of the largest manufacturers of quality peripherals, and takes half the top seller positions for gaming mice, with razer taking the other half.
We also aren't talking about any community made software or anything here. These are from reputable vendors with decades of experience and history.
If anything is irrelevant here it is your comments and those tangents.
If that were the case EVERY logitech gaming mouse made since like 2009 or so would be banned or cause issues. These are not some small sellers as I mentioned above. This is not 10-15 years ago where there were massive mouse tier lists based on budget constraints. This mouse in question has it's own freaking subreddit due to it's fanbase and pedigree.
Long story short, this tech has been around longer than this game has been in development. It is mainstream, and not something that is unusual to be installed or running under any circumstances. It is from a reputable vendor that has properly signed software.
Oh I'm not arguing that may be the case, I'm trying to logically look for reasons for the ban, Reasons that are at least in the realm of possibilities.
I have a logitech mouse also but it doesn't require software for it such as ghub, At least that I know of, I'm not even sure if installing it would allow me to control the rgb on my mouse but I'm willing to try it.
Great response by EA there.
I'm not EA.
I'm just a mod, I never once claimed to be EA.
Me too.
How you sure its GHUB?
^cheeky^0dawg, I don't use macro's not even sure how to set it up or do that. So for the future this post is for people who got ban for no legit reason. I understand people cheat and do macros but I'm not one of them. (unless re assigning a button is a macro...i don't think it is but wtf it if was).