Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxnY6kz1xTc
People simply saw this game for what it is, bad, and reviewed it accordingly.
As for the game I’ll keep an eye on it and see if it improves over a year but don’t think for one second it can be classified as ‘good’ (atleast not compared to previous bf games)
Only people calling this good are those who have no experience with a truly good fps online
I bought the game and while I am having fun with it, it’s not currently in a state where I can give it a positive rating. I could write about issues for pages on end but decided to put down the game for 6 months and if it’s still in this state, a negative review will be posted.
My raw gameplay show perfectly well how the game performe on a normal basis wich mean 99% of the time .. Reddit ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ only combine every single bugs issues etc.. and make it as if this type of crap was happening all the time .. then proceed to whine about balance change and so fort ..
Out of interrest how do you explain that this is also one of the worst rated games by professional reviews?
Btw. do you even realize that people played this game before release in the open beta - they were told it was an early version months old. Then they got the final game - how long do you think they have to play to write a review?
Edit:
This game has bad reviews because its not a good game and because it has tons of bugs. And last but not least because its not what people expected of a BF game - especially after they indicated "back to the roots" with their trailers.
Poor performance on pc, terrible design choices, lackluster gameplay, everything arcade-ified as the game was mostly tested on consoles since they didnt have the means to test multiple hardware setups. (since they had to work from home)
Let's be real here, this isn't Battlefield and insight into the development clearly shows it too, starting from a BR standpoint only to have a little over a year to finally get around to making a "Battlefield" game ... again from home mostly, not nearly enough time and that's why it's a dumpsterfire of a game.
That being said, I think over the years of "new release" games, such as cyberpunk, I feel its worth a shot to suggest that we either suck up to the price we pay or combine our efforts into something that the industry should face up to and come clean. The only way to do such a overhaul of this paradox we all seem to encounter is to quit ranting on discussion forums and put our minds together so stuff like this dosent happen. Its basically getting ripped off digitally, which is a crime even though we, again, agreed to the user license. But, that only holds up so much in court if 26k people or more face the same issues.
The game is amasing and its comming from a Planetside and Battlefield player and MAG also i have played all the best combine arms games ever since Planetside 1 and BF1942 every single battlefield beside the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ battlefield HERO i have played them all extensively
changes were long due , the non sens mainstream classes created in BF3 was a joke to me ... BF2042 is exactly like BF2 in many ways , you have dedicated rocket demolitionist , dedicated repair kit engineer , dedicated healers , dedicated amo dispanser aka support ,etc..etc..etc.. Sppecialist are perfectly fine , the design decision are overall great while some issue plague the game and some maps imbalance and so on .. wich was also present in past battlefield , many maps were favoring attacker or defenders or were favoring a side in conquest lines ... these are always work in progress stuff
Beside that there is a huge part of review bomb from haters and from peoples who tried the game on ♥♥♥♥♥♥ quad core CPU that cant run the game and are below the specs required for this game .. wich as been heaviily optimised for 6 to 8 cores CPU not 10 years old 4 core ..
So yeah the " BF 42 FPS " is one of the most copy and pasted negative review comments , others are copy and paste of the same reddit post wich trigger the hate train and review bombing ... you cant pretend the game as not been review bomb when 10 minutes after review were allowed the game was rocking 17k negative reviews ... it was premeditated
This is exactly where all the game's problems have started from