Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The numbers you see are not an accurate reflection of how good the game is. Be smart and look beyond the obvious data in front you, like an intelligent individual would.
The simple answer is: when the game was launched, the game crashed for a lot of people, so they gave it a very bad rating. Even to this day, some people still crash. I was one of the lucky ones who's game ran and continues to run flawlessly for 99.99% of the time. The devs released a lot of patches to minimize the % of crashes.
In my opinion, you should play the game for less than 2 hours and if you experience no crashes, then keep the game. If you experience frequent crashes, get a full REFUND.
We can't tell how YOUR graphics card and rig will respond to this game until you play it. You may experience zero crashes or 1 or crash every 5-20 minutes. You have to test the game to see how it behaves on your rig.
If you think about it, STEAM makes it risk-free to try games since you can get a full refund if you play it for < 2 hrs.
I leave you with two videos of the full game, so that you can see 1) how the game looks, 2) how the game runs, 3) confirm that the game just works
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTYRI7X7CkI&t=10336s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGbbpbrgnUw&t=4134s
I can run Elden Ring on High without God's rays with stable FPS, and Red Dead 2 on High but with some fluctuation on areas with dense vegetation. Do you think I will run the game at least at medium?
If you have massive stuttering, why not drop your resolution to 2K?
I played at 2K 50-60FPs with my 1080Ti, i7 3.70Ghz, 16GB RAM, just fine.
I think this is a pretty fair breakdown from someone that didn't like the game. Give it a try, but I believe at it's core LotF doesn't understand anything about Souls games.
"Blighttown: the Game."
Do with that what you will.
My personal rating is 7 out of 10. I had very few bugs or technical issues so bear that in mind. The developer is very dedicated and is trying to improve the game post-launch. There is also free content roadmap until year-end that should provide some extra content in form of quests, new spells, weapons or armors.
If you are an avid Souls-like player, Lords of the Fallen will provide hours of entertainment for sure.
You forgot to mention that 90% of the time the player has no idea where the f ck he is, and after death it's like "where the f ck did I die and where are my souls?"
dont waste your money...... the graphics are good but the gameplay is the worst souls like game I have played. You spend hours collecting the souls then die and there is no marker where you died so you can go and collect them. The bosses are not imaginative at all and utterly boring compared to other souls like games. Does not seem like any effort and imagination was put into this game.