Lies of P vs Lord of the Fallen

[Lone WOLF]

Which one do you think is more interesting?

I have played both and personally I like LotF a bit more than LoP - because for me LotF was more challenging and the online co-playing was really fun.

Give me your thoughts!

[scragglie]

lords of the fallen easily, its like 3x more content than lies of p, and better quality content as well. lies of p feels soulless while lotf feels like the devs had a very focused vision and identity they wanted to convey in this game, and they fruckin nailed it.

[Gearwar]

Lies of P takes zero risks and copies it all, but it does it so well, it practically feels like an actual souls game. Lords of the Fallen takes risks and a lot of it does not pay off. Overall the better game is lies of P. Easily, considering that Lords of the Fallen is actually a Reboot, so they already past the trial and error phase.

[Gearwar]

Originally posted by scragglie:

lords of the fallen easily, its like 3x more content than lies of p, and better quality content as well. lies of p feels soulless while lotf feels like the devs had a very focused vision and identity they wanted to convey in this game, and they fruckin nailed it.

yea but its poorly done, so whats the point? Starfield has 16x more content than super mario 64 but its all filler garbage, so who cares?
I would rather play a good 10 hour game than a mediocre 100 hour game. And Lies of P has a solid length too.

[CadaveR]

Originally posted by Gearwar:

Originally posted by scragglie:

lords of the fallen easily, its like 3x more content than lies of p, and better quality content as well. lies of p feels soulless while lotf feels like the devs had a very focused vision and identity they wanted to convey in this game, and they fruckin nailed it.

yea but its poorly done, so whats the point? Starfield has 16x more content than super mario 64 but its all filler garbage, so who cares?
I would rather play a good 10 hour game than a mediocre 100 hour game. And Lies of P has a solid length too.

But starfield is empty, LOTF isn't.

[mayhem523]

Lop is better on paper and released complete with great performance... but I still like lotf more.

[Happy Larry]

I can only say that , I just purchased Lotf ( I loved the first one as well) and Im having a blast.
Its really ♥♥♥♥♥♥ good!
I didn't play lop yet , but Im looking forward to it.
If I had to choose which one looks better , more interesting .... its easily Lords of the fallen!

[scragglie]

Originally posted by Gearwar:

Originally posted by scragglie:

lords of the fallen easily, its like 3x more content than lies of p, and better quality content as well. lies of p feels soulless while lotf feels like the devs had a very focused vision and identity they wanted to convey in this game, and they fruckin nailed it.

yea but its poorly done, so whats the point? Starfield has 16x more content than super mario 64 but its all filler garbage, so who cares?
I would rather play a good 10 hour game than a mediocre 100 hour game. And Lies of P has a solid length too.

its only "poorly done" in your opinion you brainlet, you sit here and act like your opinion is fact, lies of p does nothing even remotely unique or interesting, there is literally nothing in lies of p that hasnt been done better by other games.

[prnellom0922]

LOTF is the better overall game, but at least Lies of P was optimized on day 1 lol

[Boogie]

LOTF is a way better game

[CadaveR]

Originally posted by prnellom0922:

Lies of P blows this game out of the water when it comes to optimization/performance. A game in 2023 shouldn't crash multiple times in an hour with updated drivers. Lords of The Fallen on the other hand feels like it offers more in terms of being a complete game. Both are worth the money.

Lies of P is so short? It has some replayability?

[Happy Larry]

Originally posted by prnellom0922:

Lies of P blows this game out of the water when it comes to optimization/performance. A game in 2023 shouldn't crash multiple times in an hour with updated drivers. Lords of The Fallen on the other hand feels like it offers more in terms of being a complete game. Both are worth the money.

Idk , on my pc which is nowhere close to high end , runs flawlessly on ultra settings / ultrawide 1440p, without dlss at 100-140 fps. Guess its your pc then cuz I don't think its poorly optimized.

[MasterZalm]

Originally posted by scragglie:

its only "poorly done" in your opinion you brainlet, you sit here and act like your opinion is fact, lies of p does nothing even remotely unique or interesting, there is literally nothing in lies of p that hasnt been done better by other games.

I would argue the weapon system in Lies of Piss was actually really cool and fun. I hope to see a better game with it in the future, honestly.

Other than that, yeah. It felt like a really bad Sekiro/Souls hybrid with nothing of interest to offer.

[Okat]

Lies of P easily because I loved the more focused design with great bosses. I can only think of one boss I didn't like. The only thing I liked about LOTF is exploration and gearing. Bosses were just so easy you could do it in your sleep and they all become trash mobs later, which kind of adds to lack of mob diversity. Both are around 30hr length, where in lies of P, most of that time is gonna go to fighting bosses, and in LOTF, most of that time will go into exploration and getting lost. Maybe I would've enjoyed more if the performance was better because even if I'm getting 100+ FPS, it just doesn't feel smooth. I heard frametime was really bad or something.

[I_come_in_peace]

I like both. LotF is clearly way more ambitious and graphically a generation ahead, compared LoP looks quite sterile and, well, assembled, but it has fun combat with a lot of variety and the character models are great! I've been switching a bit between both to give my old brain some workout with the different timings and mechanics but now settled on finishing LotF first. But I am looking forward to playing LoP afterwards. And then Alan Wake II ... Lord, give me time ...

[SKINLESSHEAD]

Originally posted by scragglie:

Originally posted by Gearwar:

yea but its poorly done, so whats the point? Starfield has 16x more content than super mario 64 but its all filler garbage, so who cares?
I would rather play a good 10 hour game than a mediocre 100 hour game. And Lies of P has a solid length too.

its only "poorly done" in your opinion you brainlet, you sit here and act like your opinion is fact, lies of p does nothing even remotely unique or interesting, there is literally nothing in lies of p that hasnt been done better by other games.

This post really shows off your lack of self awareness. Lies of P is the better game btw.