Cleansing the beacon question (future patch hopefully)

[peppo861]

Do you guys think they will include a way in the next patches for us to be able to corrupt a previously cleanse becon again?
I mean, being totally locked up from Inferno and Umbral ending just for "lighting up" the first beacon seems very unfair to me.
I would prefer to finish my first play through with the inferno ending, but I'm forced now to do the radiance one (or even worse to be stucked completely and be cut off from ANY ending in the game)

[Skeleton June]

Apparently you can find Damarose's body at the shrine of adyr after you beat her at the gate and use the seedpod on it. Which would seem to let you start up the umbral ending after you light a beacon. Except for the fact that the quest sometimes doesn't progress when you do it. So I think there's a bug.

[peppo861]

that's actually interesting, I had no idea.
So no real way to do the inferno ending for this playthrough I guess?

[Louu]

Originally posted by peppo861:

that's actually interesting, I had no idea.
So no real way to do the inferno ending for this playthrough I guess?

I suppose not, but I hope the Devs add to the next patch some way so that people who have unknowingly cleansed one or two beacons can come back and unclease.

[peppo861]

Originally posted by Louu:

Originally posted by peppo861:

that's actually interesting, I had no idea.
So no real way to do the inferno ending for this playthrough I guess?

I suppose not, but I hope the Devs add to the next patch some way so that people who have unknowingly cleansed one or two beacons can come back and unclease.

That is exactly my point, it wouldn't be even that hard to do!

[DeadByDefault]

It is supposed to work the way it does now. The beacon asks whether you want to cleanse it. There is no accident in it. When I approached the first beacon and it asked whether I wanted to cleanse it instead of just doing it right away, I knew that it had to have something to do with the main quest progression.

[KoD]

So finish the radiant ending, start NG or NG+0 and do the other endings. If you plan to spend more time in the game, why would getting another ending first matters? And if you don't, why would it matter which ending you get?

[peppo861]

Originally posted by KoD:

So finish the radiant ending, start NG or NG+0 and do the other endings. If you plan to spend more time in the game, why would getting another ending first matters? And if you don't, why would it matter which ending you get?

Of course I will finish it with the radiant ending now, and I'll do the Inferno ending at ng+1.
It's ok since they also put ng+0 now to make things faster, I also come to discover that to get all the inferno sorceries you also need to do the radiant ending, so I guess I'll stick with that

[peppo861]

but wouldn't it be fair to give us the chance to make things right at least for the first beacon we find? when a player still has no clue about game lore or what the heck to do in the game, that was my only concern.

[Namethatworks]

Originally posted by peppo861:

but wouldn't it be fair to give us the chance to make things right at least for the first beacon we find? when a player still has no clue about game lore or what the heck to do in the game, that was my only concern.

I'd say no, Damarose tells you not to as doing so would go against Adyr. And the game literally asks you if you're sure.

And cleansing even one turns her hostile. There maybe a way to still get the Umbral ending.(which may or not be possible.) But, logically that should permanently remove the Adyr Ending for the playthrough.