Store Page
Gotham Knights
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Gotham Knights

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
DrDarkStorm Oct 29, 2022 @ 1:48am
Batman arkham knight vs. Gothem knights
Is this the same team who made both these games?
I very much love Warner Bro. Games and the batman series, but wow what happened.
It is very nice to have a newer RPG DC universe game.
And I hope the very best for this games future, which i fully support. But again wow
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
Kawalorn Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:03am 
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins, and even then you should not expect same quality, as they just copy pasted Arkham City and used it as a base for Origins.

Gotham Knights has a lot less polish and flair compared to Knight and even the older titles. It also has less unique set-pieces with higher focus on farming items in the city instead.

One would even argue the game looks worse than Knight.

Generally the game itself isn't super bad but not worth the asking price IMO and if you wanted another Arkham game you'll just end up feeling like you're playing a budget version of it.
Last edited by Kawalorn; Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:04am
#1
Dasguy Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:16am 
problem is people go into the game expecting it to be the Arkham games which its not.
#2
Mr_Meik Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:17am 
Sorry, but I don't know where Gotham Knights is supposed to be great.
I'm now so far that I have to work with support to make the game playable, because I just can't get past the beginning missions because the game keeps crashing in the bell tower.
I can't recommend this game to anyone at the moment. Not even if it were free.
Whereby we come straight to the price, which is much too high.
If I look at Spiderman Remastered in comparison, then I know that Gotham Knights can cost a maximum of 20 €. And that's sad for me compared to other games that offer much better graphics, handling, etc.
I hope to be able to play Gotham Knights half way or even the end because I'm just stuck and frustrated
#3
DrDarkStorm Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:21am 
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins, and even then you should not expect same quality, as they just copy pasted Arkham City and used it as a base for Origins.

Gotham Knights has a lot less polish and flair compared to Knight and even the older titles. It also has less unique set-pieces with higher focus on farming items in the city instead.

One would even argue the game looks worse than Knight.

Generally the game itself isn't super bad but not worth the asking price IMO and if you wanted another Arkham game you'll just end up feeling like you're playing a budget version of it.


Well I consider gothem knights as the base or the platform start and can see alot of growth opportunities, I mean if cyberpunk 2077 can get better, so can this.
#4
2D神 Oct 29, 2022 @ 2:27am 
Not the same team.
#5
Kawalorn Oct 29, 2022 @ 3:52am 
Originally posted by DrewskePowers:
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins, and even then you should not expect same quality, as they just copy pasted Arkham City and used it as a base for Origins.

Gotham Knights has a lot less polish and flair compared to Knight and even the older titles. It also has less unique set-pieces with higher focus on farming items in the city instead.

One would even argue the game looks worse than Knight.

Generally the game itself isn't super bad but not worth the asking price IMO and if you wanted another Arkham game you'll just end up feeling like you're playing a budget version of it.


Well I consider gothem knights as the base or the platform start and can see alot of growth opportunities, I mean if cyberpunk 2077 can get better, so can this.
Sure. Just another reason to wait longer and not buy it in it's current state.
#6
Arkham99 Oct 29, 2022 @ 4:47am 
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins
No. WB Montreal worked on 'Arkham Knight' with rocksteady... I believe that they were solely responsible for the BatGirl DLC among other numerous tasks... as was rocksteady supporting the 'Origins' game... there's alot of crossover actually...:-)
#7
Kawalorn Oct 29, 2022 @ 4:49am 
Originally posted by Arkham99:
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins
No. WB Montreal worked on 'Arkham Knight' with rocksteady... I believe that they were solely responsible for the BatGirl DLC among other numerous tasks... as was rocksteady supporting the 'Origins' game... there's alot of crossover actually...:-)
Making one DLC doesn't sound like "a lot of crossover" to me, and looking how many things Arkham does better than Gotham it's clear who was pulling the weight in that one.

Same as with Origin, the Batgirl DLC was built on what Arkham Knight already made, so as good as they are at using pre-existing bases, they aren't very good at creating their own.
Last edited by Kawalorn; Oct 29, 2022 @ 4:50am
#8
Arkham99 Oct 29, 2022 @ 4:52am 
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
the Batgirl DLC was built on what Arkham Knight already made
No. it's standalone and not even part of the map...:-)
#9
Kai Oct 29, 2022 @ 5:17am 
Originally posted by DrewskePowers:
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
No. The guys who made Gotham Knights only made Arkham Origins, and even then you should not expect same quality, as they just copy pasted Arkham City and used it as a base for Origins.

Gotham Knights has a lot less polish and flair compared to Knight and even the older titles. It also has less unique set-pieces with higher focus on farming items in the city instead.

One would even argue the game looks worse than Knight.

Generally the game itself isn't super bad but not worth the asking price IMO and if you wanted another Arkham game you'll just end up feeling like you're playing a budget version of it.


Well I consider gothem knights as the base or the platform start and can see alot of growth opportunities, I mean if cyberpunk 2077 can get better, so can this.
Wait until they sell you DLCs then.
#10
DrDarkStorm Oct 29, 2022 @ 9:24am 
Originally posted by Kawalorn:
Originally posted by DrewskePowers:


Well I consider gothem knights as the base or the platform start and can see alot of growth opportunities, I mean if cyberpunk 2077 can get better, so can this.
Sure. Just another reason to wait longer and not buy it in it's current state.

I think of most games including AAA games to be early access games at this point, Its more like a investment. remember the good ol'days when a game would come out and it would need just a 'Day One' patch and the game would be good forever. ahh I miss those days lol
#11
Karmadive Oct 29, 2022 @ 9:52am 
I personally couldn't finish Arkham Knight. I just ended up getting into back to back batmobile battles and I was done, I did not like that part of the game I just wanted combat as Batman.

It's pc launch was worse then Gotham knights, they even pulled it from pc. Ended up playing it on PlayStation then PC because of the problems. I prefer Arkham Asylum and City by far over Knight.

Arkham had smoother combat but I'm still enjoying Gotham Knights.

However if your unsure about buying it I would personally give it some time to see what the next week or so of patches does. Currently the patches haven't really pushed the bar far in my opinion. Just kinda solving problems but causing others at equal amount.
#12
< >
Showing 1-12 of 12 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Gotham Knights > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Oct 29, 2022 @ 1:48am
Posts: 12

Discussions Rules and Guidelines