Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks, I have been looking for an answer for this question for a very long time. This also both gives an explanation of the amount of the bonus and what affects it and it is crystal clear.
Just to clarify, the units which can grant this bonus are all units with polearms? This would mean all these units would grant the bonus: Spearman, Sentinel, Samurai, Centurion, Hussar and Scout? Or are some of those units excluded from granting the bonus?
You mean polearm warrior? If so then I would assume that means that the Scout and Hussar gives the bonus as they have the polearm warrior skill and it mentions they have 2 polearm attacks at range 1?
yes i believe scouts and hussars also provide the bonus, theyre all polearm units, as well as samurais and centurions
Thank you for answering this question. I had previously wondered about this the same way the OP did: i.e. was the bonus applied to units adjacent a half-step up or down when in front or in back of the polearm user, or did they have to be in the exact same column. Eventually I stopped wondering because I figured the description was clear: "any adjacent unit" meant just that.
However, it appears it is not "any" but only adjacent in the same row. Would it then be possible to either change the description in the tech tree to "Polearm units now grant bonus attack and defense to adjacent units in the same row.", or else, better yet (imho), change the mechanic to match the current description and leave the description as is?
yes!! i wanted to make that exact same suggestion!!