Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
that's wild. imagine being held hostage in a losing game. insane change.
what is the point of playing only against AI? There are problems in multiplayer and the vast majority of players are in multiplayer, so before dealing with solo, there are better things to do, then the AIs have been greatly improved, so what you are saying is wrong..
Is this your first week of playing video games? It's hard to view your question in any other way than simply trolling.
There are problems everywhere, and? What stats do you use to formulate these statements?
And on top of that- it's rather obvious that when SP offering is very poor, and there's nothing to play, players interested in single-player (a majority of people in general) fall off quickly after going through everything the game has to offer.
Do you have polls where saying that the majority of people that bought the game, did it for the competitive scene? Please do share. Maybe that poll also covers the question about SP content and a vote against bringing more skirmish modes and campaigns.
Asking why people want to play against AI is simply astounding, as it's the standard and a foundation of vast, VAST majority of games ever created.
Thing is it's the right game at the hands of the wrong developers.