Página de la tienda
Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition
Todo Discusiones Capturas Artwork Retransmisiones Vídeos Noticias Guías Reseñas

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition

Página de la tienda
Ver estadísticas:
Logros mundiales
Mr.Frog 8 ABR a las 13:05
Knight's Templar
Anyone else think the different Commanderie troops should speak the language of their native countries instead of just recycling French voice lines? Like Teutonic Knights speak German and Szlachta cavalry speak Polish?
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 25 comentarios
Many-Named 8 ABR a las 13:28 
2
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
#1
Zargkhon 8 ABR a las 13:50 
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.
#2
Mr.Frog 8 ABR a las 14:16 
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
Not even that far. I figured the Teutonic Knights would reuse the HRE MAA voice lines since the Teutonic Order was German.
#3
Many-Named 8 ABR a las 14:23 
Publicado originalmente por Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
#4
Soul Reaver 8 ABR a las 14:25 
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well
#5
Many-Named 8 ABR a las 14:28 
Publicado originalmente por Soul Reaver:
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well

SO cheap
#6
Gundalf 8 ABR a las 14:49 
Could have just "borrowed" the aoe 2 voice lines considering that most of the commandery units are the unique units there.
#7
Jebe 8 ABR a las 14:54 
And no new biome
#8
Jack_Burton 8 ABR a las 15:51 
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:
Publicado originalmente por Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?
#9
DerRitter 8 ABR a las 15:51 
Agreed
#10
DerRitter 8 ABR a las 15:51 
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:
Publicado originalmente por Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3
#11
Soul Reaver 8 ABR a las 15:54 
Publicado originalmente por Jack_Burton:
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all
#12
Many-Named 8 ABR a las 16:22 
Publicado originalmente por Jack_Burton:
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

I know what you mean it does have its merits for sure, but I just can't live with flat terrain maps anymore. And AOE4 has a kinetic feel to it that no other age game has imo
#13
NoobusMaximus 8 ABR a las 16:26 
Publicado originalmente por DerRitter:
Publicado originalmente por Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3

Numbers speak for themselves. If 3 was better they would have supported 3.
#14
Jack_Burton 8 ABR a las 16:59 
Publicado originalmente por Soul Reaver:
Publicado originalmente por Jack_Burton:

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all

Oh yeah I played 2 way back and didnt like it lol.

I have settled on AoE3 DE version specifically because it adds US, Mexico, Malta, Italy, Inca, Sweden, Ethiopia, and Hausa as playable civs. Each is drastically different than the standard AoE European Civ.

The Shipment and Revolution mechanics alone make for a much wider variety amongst the Civs.
#15
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 25 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition > Discusiones generales > Detalles del tema
Publicado el: 8 ABR a las 13:05
Mensajes: 25

Normas y directrices sobre discusión