Pagina din magazin
Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition
Toate Discuții Capturi de ecran Ilustrații Difuzări Videoclipuri Știri Ghiduri Recenzii

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition

Pagina din magazin
Vezi statistici:
Realizări globale
Mr.Frog 8 apr. la 13:05
Knight's Templar
Anyone else think the different Commanderie troops should speak the language of their native countries instead of just recycling French voice lines? Like Teutonic Knights speak German and Szlachta cavalry speak Polish?
< >
Se afișează 1-15 din 25 comentarii
Many-Named 8 apr. la 13:28 
2
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
#1
Zargkhon 8 apr. la 13:50 
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.
#2
Mr.Frog 8 apr. la 14:16 
Postat inițial de Many-Named:
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
Not even that far. I figured the Teutonic Knights would reuse the HRE MAA voice lines since the Teutonic Order was German.
#3
Many-Named 8 apr. la 14:23 
Postat inițial de Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
#4
Soul Reaver 8 apr. la 14:25 
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well
#5
Many-Named 8 apr. la 14:28 
Postat inițial de Soul Reaver:
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well

SO cheap
#6
Gundalf 8 apr. la 14:49 
Could have just "borrowed" the aoe 2 voice lines considering that most of the commandery units are the unique units there.
#7
Jebe 8 apr. la 14:54 
And no new biome
#8
Jack_Burton 8 apr. la 15:51 
Postat inițial de Many-Named:
Postat inițial de Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?
#9
DerRitter 8 apr. la 15:51 
Agreed
#10
DerRitter 8 apr. la 15:51 
Postat inițial de Many-Named:
Postat inițial de Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3
#11
Soul Reaver 8 apr. la 15:54 
Postat inițial de Jack_Burton:
Postat inițial de Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all
#12
Many-Named 8 apr. la 16:22 
Postat inițial de Jack_Burton:
Postat inițial de Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

I know what you mean it does have its merits for sure, but I just can't live with flat terrain maps anymore. And AOE4 has a kinetic feel to it that no other age game has imo
#13
NoobusMaximus 8 apr. la 16:26 
Postat inițial de DerRitter:
Postat inițial de Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3

Numbers speak for themselves. If 3 was better they would have supported 3.
#14
Jack_Burton 8 apr. la 16:59 
Postat inițial de Soul Reaver:
Postat inițial de Jack_Burton:

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all

Oh yeah I played 2 way back and didnt like it lol.

I have settled on AoE3 DE version specifically because it adds US, Mexico, Malta, Italy, Inca, Sweden, Ethiopia, and Hausa as playable civs. Each is drastically different than the standard AoE European Civ.

The Shipment and Revolution mechanics alone make for a much wider variety amongst the Civs.
#15
< >
Se afișează 1-15 din 25 comentarii
Per pagină: 1530 50

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition > Discuții generale > Detaliile subiectului
Data postării: 8 apr. la 13:05
Postări: 25

Reguli și ghiduri pentru discuții