Halaman Toko
Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition
Semua Diskusi Screenshot Ilustrasi Siaran Video Berita Panduan Ulasan

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition

Halaman Toko
Lihat Statistik:
Pencapaian Global
Mr.Frog 8 Apr @ 1:05pm
Knight's Templar
Anyone else think the different Commanderie troops should speak the language of their native countries instead of just recycling French voice lines? Like Teutonic Knights speak German and Szlachta cavalry speak Polish?
< >
Menampilkan 1-15 dari 25 komentar
Many-Named 8 Apr @ 1:28pm 
2
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
#1
Zargkhon 8 Apr @ 1:50pm 
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.
#2
Mr.Frog 8 Apr @ 2:16pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
Not even that far. I figured the Teutonic Knights would reuse the HRE MAA voice lines since the Teutonic Order was German.
#3
Many-Named 8 Apr @ 2:23pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
#4
Soul Reaver 8 Apr @ 2:25pm 
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well
#5
Many-Named 8 Apr @ 2:28pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Soul Reaver:
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well

SO cheap
#6
Gundalf 8 Apr @ 2:49pm 
Could have just "borrowed" the aoe 2 voice lines considering that most of the commandery units are the unique units there.
#7
Jebe 8 Apr @ 2:54pm 
And no new biome
#8
Jack_Burton 8 Apr @ 3:51pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?
#9
DerRitter 8 Apr @ 3:51pm 
Agreed
#10
DerRitter 8 Apr @ 3:51pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3
#11
Soul Reaver 8 Apr @ 3:54pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Jack_Burton:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all
#12
Many-Named 8 Apr @ 4:22pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Jack_Burton:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

I know what you mean it does have its merits for sure, but I just can't live with flat terrain maps anymore. And AOE4 has a kinetic feel to it that no other age game has imo
#13
NoobusMaximus 8 Apr @ 4:26pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh DerRitter:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3

Numbers speak for themselves. If 3 was better they would have supported 3.
#14
Jack_Burton 8 Apr @ 4:59pm 
Diposting pertama kali oleh Soul Reaver:
Diposting pertama kali oleh Jack_Burton:

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all

Oh yeah I played 2 way back and didnt like it lol.

I have settled on AoE3 DE version specifically because it adds US, Mexico, Malta, Italy, Inca, Sweden, Ethiopia, and Hausa as playable civs. Each is drastically different than the standard AoE European Civ.

The Shipment and Revolution mechanics alone make for a much wider variety amongst the Civs.
#15
< >
Menampilkan 1-15 dari 25 komentar
Per halaman: 1530 50

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition > Diskusi Umum > Rincian Topik
Tanggal Diposting: 8 Apr @ 1:05pm
Postingan: 25

Pedoman dan Aturan Diskusi