Store Page
Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
Mr.Frog Apr 8 @ 1:05pm
Knight's Templar
Anyone else think the different Commanderie troops should speak the language of their native countries instead of just recycling French voice lines? Like Teutonic Knights speak German and Szlachta cavalry speak Polish?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 25 comments
Many-Named Apr 8 @ 1:28pm 
2
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
#1
Zargkhon Apr 8 @ 1:50pm 
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.
#2
Mr.Frog Apr 8 @ 2:16pm 
Originally posted by Many-Named:
100% thus the negative review.

Voice actors are not even that expensive.
Not even that far. I figured the Teutonic Knights would reuse the HRE MAA voice lines since the Teutonic Order was German.
#3
Many-Named Apr 8 @ 2:23pm 
Originally posted by Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
#4
Soul Reaver Apr 8 @ 2:25pm 
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well
#5
Many-Named Apr 8 @ 2:28pm 
Originally posted by Soul Reaver:
well it is a variant civ, thats what you get, i assume they didn't add any new soundtrack as well

SO cheap
#6
Gundalf Apr 8 @ 2:49pm 
Could have just "borrowed" the aoe 2 voice lines considering that most of the commandery units are the unique units there.
#7
Jebe Apr 8 @ 2:54pm 
And no new biome
#8
Jack_Burton Apr 8 @ 3:51pm 
Originally posted by Many-Named:
Originally posted by Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?
#9
DerRitter Apr 8 @ 3:51pm 
Agreed
#10
DerRitter Apr 8 @ 3:51pm 
Originally posted by Many-Named:
Originally posted by Zargkhon:
Why would they do that? That would require Effort and some Work. They know you pay 15$ for basicly nothing. They all laugh at you. Game is still a ♥♥♥♥ Mobile Game.

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3
#11
Soul Reaver Apr 8 @ 3:54pm 
Originally posted by Jack_Burton:
Originally posted by Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all
#12
Many-Named Apr 8 @ 4:22pm 
Originally posted by Jack_Burton:
Originally posted by Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

I know what you mean it does have its merits for sure, but I just can't live with flat terrain maps anymore. And AOE4 has a kinetic feel to it that no other age game has imo
#13
NoobusMaximus Apr 8 @ 4:26pm 
Originally posted by DerRitter:
Originally posted by Many-Named:

It's not, it's a great game and a great age of empires game. Better than 3 imo.
its not better than 3

Numbers speak for themselves. If 3 was better they would have supported 3.
#14
Jack_Burton Apr 8 @ 4:59pm 
Originally posted by Soul Reaver:
Originally posted by Jack_Burton:

I started out on 4 and swapped to 3. 3 has a much better unit variety and civ variety imo. 4 is good, but most of the civs felt too similar. I think that's why you see them basically making "variants".

For instance, the AoE3 counterpart to Knights Templar is Malta. How does the Knights Templar compare to the AoE3 Malta civ?

if civs in 4 are too similar for you then you apparently didn't try AoE 2 at all

Oh yeah I played 2 way back and didnt like it lol.

I have settled on AoE3 DE version specifically because it adds US, Mexico, Malta, Italy, Inca, Sweden, Ethiopia, and Hausa as playable civs. Each is drastically different than the standard AoE European Civ.

The Shipment and Revolution mechanics alone make for a much wider variety amongst the Civs.
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 25 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Age of Empires IV: Anniversary Edition > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Apr 8 @ 1:05pm
Posts: 25

Discussions Rules and Guidelines