game sucks

[happy_d_emo]

dude i'm really disappointed..

[Sir Moisty Capybara]

FloosWorld の投稿を引用：

Sir Moisty Capybara の投稿を引用：

lol. I liked like you literally just escaped entire post before that floos didn't responded too at all. I don't really care that much if he feels attacked or im compared to dog (which can be true, they are smarter than some people, but I feel you are projecting something into me).

Lul, I don't feel attacked, I feel entertained by the continuous attempts to attack me. I just gave up wasting my energy for longer and detailed answers on you. :-)

yet you are wasting steam forum space for your 0 content posts.

ok.

karoten2 の投稿を引用：

Heraclius Caesar の投稿を引用：

Uhh.. what? I'm intensely curious as to why you're attempting to somehow answer for me and also why you're making things up that I didn't say?

Sometime before AoE4 release, You critised AoE4 not being "inovative", like there are features from Total War and Crusaders Kings, which could or should be implemented into Age of Empires,

Somebody asked You, what can be implemented from Crusader Kings into Age of Empires 4, You claimed, that "You need to play Crusader Kings to understand it, it is ultimate medieval strategy game"

You stated that Age of Empires 4 and Crusaders Kings are same game genre - historical medieval strategy game

There was whole discussion here on forum,

These "opinions" were so "unique", that is reason, why I remember You and your statements

why you simply don't quote his opinions then and start cutting them apart again?

[Heraclius Caesar]

karoten2 の投稿を引用：

Heraclius Caesar の投稿を引用：

Uhh.. what? I'm intensely curious as to why you're attempting to somehow answer for me and also why you're making things up that I didn't say?

Sometime before AoE4 release, You critised AoE4 not being "inovative", like there are features from Total War and Crusaders Kings, which could or should be implemented into Age of Empires,

Somebody asked You, what can be implemented from Crusader Kings into Age of Empires 4, You claimed, that "You need to play Crusader Kings to understand it, it is ultimate medieval strategy game"

You stated that Age of Empires 4 and Crusaders Kings are same game genre - historical medieval strategy game

There was whole discussion here on forum,

These "opinions" were so "unique", that is reason, why I remember You and your statements

So what? None of these opinions directly translates to me stating or complaining that I don't like AoE4 simply because it's not similar to Crusader Kings, nor do these opinions of mine entitle you to speak for me or answer for me as if you were my friend or confidant, which you are not. I never expected it to be similar to Crusader Kings. My whole point with the statements that you're referring to was that in between older Age of Empires titles and Age of Empires 4, Crusader Kings rose to popularity and demonstrates a solid historical experience and a superior campaign in comparison to Age of Empires. Basically they could have done more with AoE4, it could have been a bigger, grander game than it has turned out to be.

That being said, you don't get to speak for me, you don't get to answer for me. I'm not sure why you thought you could, that's some really weird behavior on your part, if you don't realize that then Idk what to tell you but that's your problem and not mine. Keep my name out of your mouth. You do not speak for me in any way so don't do that again.

[󠀱]

Ppl start up posts because... other people enjoy a game?

[Bubs]

ty troll. remember why you are level 0

[haploki]

Not certain what those who think this is a good game are taking, but I want some.

The franchise has always survived on two things:

One: Fairly good graphics for the time... OK, still check.

Two: Multiple dynamic cultures and story-lines... Not so much this time.

Instead they banged out four campaigns (two sides of two stories) and then relied on people to flock to multiplayer battles on their maps and kitschy NFT rewards that come from passing landmarks in multiplayer mode.

Some of us just aren't as thrilled with being yelled at in all caps by sociopathic teenagers and college students.

We want more single player content... Ya-know, like the original Age of Empires games had.

OP isn't wrong.

[Sir Moisty Capybara]

Sam Bankman-Fried の投稿を引用：

Ppl start up posts because... other people enjoy a game?

yawn

Bubs の投稿を引用：

ty troll. remember why you are level 0

yawn

haploki の投稿を引用：

Not certain what those who think this is a good game are taking, but I want some.

The franchise has always survived on two things:

One: Fairly good graphics for the time... OK, still check.

Two: Multiple dynamic cultures and story-lines... Not so much this time.

Instead they banged out four campaigns (two sides of two stories) and then relied on people to flock to multiplayer battles on their maps and kitschy NFT rewards that come from passing landmarks in multiplayer mode.

Some of us just aren't as thrilled with being yelled at in all caps by sociopathic teenagers and college students.

We want more single player content... Ya-know, like the original Age of Empires games had.

OP isn't wrong.

The saddest part about said campaigns is the fact they COULD invest way more money into those instead of some real-life sudo documentary cinematic or overstretching content (f.e. OST for every single) civ. But they went with "let's make passable campaigns and hope gameplay is solid".

[Large C]

Sir Moisty Capybara の投稿を引用：

Sam Bankman-Fried の投稿を引用：

Ppl start up posts because... other people enjoy a game?

yawn

Bubs の投稿を引用：

ty troll. remember why you are level 0

yawn

haploki の投稿を引用：

Not certain what those who think this is a good game are taking, but I want some.

The franchise has always survived on two things:

One: Fairly good graphics for the time... OK, still check.

Two: Multiple dynamic cultures and story-lines... Not so much this time.

Instead they banged out four campaigns (two sides of two stories) and then relied on people to flock to multiplayer battles on their maps and kitschy NFT rewards that come from passing landmarks in multiplayer mode.

Some of us just aren't as thrilled with being yelled at in all caps by sociopathic teenagers and college students.

We want more single player content... Ya-know, like the original Age of Empires games had.

OP isn't wrong.

The saddest part about said campaigns is the fact they COULD invest way more money into those instead of some real-life sudo documentary cinematic or overstretching content (f.e. OST for every single) civ. But they went with "let's make passable campaigns and hope gameplay is solid".

im mostly 3vs3 and 4vs4 player, usuaally dont use to do campaings bcos my gameplay choice is playing matches, but i i tryed campaing and what i liket a lot, not as much as playing a full game, but what i most enjoyed is the real-life studio documentary cinematic (learned lot of world histoy) and passable campaigns (fit perfect with it), loving the game. Play games you like and avoid those you dont, is all in your hands

[Sir Moisty Capybara]

LargeCaca の投稿を引用：

Sir Moisty Capybara の投稿を引用：

The saddest part about said campaigns is the fact they COULD invest way more money into those instead of some real-life sudo documentary cinematic or overstretching content (f.e. OST for every single) civ. But they went with "let's make passable campaigns and hope gameplay is solid".

im mostly 3vs3 and 4vs4 player, usuaally dont use to do campaings bcos my gameplay choice is playing matches, but i i tryed campaing and what i liket a lot, not as much as playing a full game, but what i most enjoyed is the real-life studio documentary cinematic (learned lot of world histoy) and passable campaigns (fit perfect with it), loving the game. Play games you like and avoid those you dont, is all in your hands

I like arguing about points that im pretty sure about it. Why should I avoid talking about something don't like, when I'm doing in enough polite manner and being able to actually point out WHY I don't like it.

And if you like it - sure, but I would say looking at https://www.youtube.com/@SandRhomanHistory and https://www.youtube.com/@InvictaHistory will prolly teach you more than AoE4 cinematics. But of course, history is shifting subject.

As for 3v3 / 4v4, I felt like CoH2 was way better game in that matter imho. IDK what about CoH3.

[skorzenydeathangel]

Heraclius Caesar の投稿を引用：

You're not wrong

[I AM HIM]

LargeCaca の投稿を引用：

game is good, very good. top of aoe saga. once you get into it wont go back to any other aoe, this is the best by far

I guess thats why age2 DE has twice the players on average as age 4?

[I AM HIM]

Bendy52 の投稿を引用：

btw out of us me and friends at work and real life friends who plays AOE4 (we are 7 in total) we have 3 on xbox pass.

all of us played AOE2 before and DE included, and 4 of us played all the AOE games since 1, also C&C series, and Battle for middle earth series among other smaller IP like empire earth and such...... all of us moved to AOE4. so the only valid criticism is the situation the game was at release. now its much superior game to AOE2 DE by any sane human standard. yet u dont find me on AOE2 forums here trying to spit my acid on AOE2 fans. like someone here who knows himself.

Thats funny because out of my group of friends, 2 refunded the game before 2 hours, and the last 3 and myself don't even touch it. We all went back to age2HD and DE. Funny how DE has double the active players than this game

[Bubs]

ty for your input

[grraf]

El Fabuloso の投稿を引用：

AoE 4 is one of the best RTS games in the market

^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7WI_NwUiNg nah f' this , hope to God hes just too young and ignorant to know about any of the older 'golden age' RTS games as its almost sacrilege to compare this crud to the likes of Starcraft, Command and Conquer, Cossacks, Empire Earth, Warcraft, Battle realms or even Aoe2 for that matter

[Sir Moisty Capybara]

grraf の投稿を引用：

El Fabuloso の投稿を引用：

AoE 4 is one of the best RTS games in the market

^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7WI_NwUiNg nah f' this , hope to God hes just too young and ignorant to know about any of the older 'golden age' RTS games as its almost sacrilege to compare this crud to the likes of Starcraft, Command and Conquer, Cossacks, Empire Earth, Warcraft, Battle realms or even Aoe2 for that matter :stress:

AoE 4 is ripoff from Castle Strike

[Haak]

my question is how long have you even played it, probably one of those 1 hour types and then saying the game is bad