Please do not make same mistake as The Cycle: Frontier.

[ProVegaGamer]

This game looks similar to The Cycle: Frontier, devs please make a mode just to allow Solo/Single player PVE content as well. Please do not make same bad business decision like The Cycle: Frontier, its one of the reasons that game shut down because the cheaters became a problem and the devs did not listen about making a only PVE mode.

[George | tinyBuild]

Hey there.

Just to build up your expectations right: we're not planning on adding a single player mode so far. There is a slight possibility of this happening in the future (we have the Early Access phase and the 1.0 launch); however, we see LZ: E as a multiplayer-focused game.

[REAPER]

No, the solos and vocal minority are what killed the cycle. Dont let anyone play solo ever

[George | tinyBuild]

There will be the possibility of playing solo; the single-player story mode is something that's not planned.

[ProVegaGamer]

Originally posted by REAPER:

No, the solos and vocal minority are what killed the cycle. Dont let anyone play solo ever

Actually cheaters killed the game, everyone knows this, the devs even said it. Alot of the members wanted a PVE only mode, because the cheating got out of control, which it did.

[REAPER]

Originally posted by LAPDAlonzo:

Originally posted by REAPER:

No, the solos and vocal minority are what killed the cycle. Dont let anyone play solo ever

Actually cheaters killed the game, everyone knows this, the devs even said it. Alot of the members wanted a PVE only mode, because the cheating got out of control, which it did.

nobody wants PVE do a poll and prove me wrong

[pgames-food]

pve options are fun,
sure this will be cool in multiplayer, but dont underestimate the coolness of pve as well

[TheNasky]

what killed the cycle TWICE was its big focus on pve combined with lackluster pvp.

the original the cycle was actually a good game, it just needed more focus on PvP, the combat was fun, it just needed more pvp and ways to incorporate more pvp into its fun pve. the cycle frontier was just plain bad, it felt like it was super rushed and soulless. i have yet to see a single instance of "let's pivot to extraction based" work well.

anyways, this game doesn't seem to be much like the cycle, i don't see how single player pve would make much sense when all the fun is in the multiplayer.

[ToneBone]

Originally posted by LAPDAlonzo:

Originally posted by REAPER:

No, the solos and vocal minority are what killed the cycle. Dont let anyone play solo ever

Actually cheaters killed the game, everyone knows this, the devs even said it. Alot of the members wanted a PVE only mode, because the cheating got out of control, which it did.

why did you compare the cycle to this game in the first place??? They aren't the same in fact id say its like evolve and extraction looters had a baby

[Maxh]

No content kill the cycle After the beta its the same game at the full release

[-=Kowie=-]

The Cycle Frontier gave the whole game away for free and gave no reason to spend money on it, the game ran out of money even their anti cheat team were discontinued towards the end when the devs couldn't afford their services.

If Escape From Tarkov gave the whole game away for free they would have shut down 6 years ago and the game wouldn't have the content is has now(EFT has something like 80 devs working on the game).

Money makes things possible and buys more time to improve a game, TCF had next to no money coming in.

Devs fixing stuff adding content and maintaining servers and combating cheaters all cost money, im surprised Frontiers lasted as long as they did the game had a terrible monetization model, if they had more money coming in they could have kept that anti cheat team around and further improved their game and hell even could have explored a PVE mode but nope someone at the top tried to operate on f2p pie in the sky napkin math that didn't play out as they expected.

[Cik]

Solo players are the Sweet Baby Inc. of the player-base; everything they cry for ends up being the games downfall.

[Buried in insanity]

what the cycle killed was tencent! the cycle made enough money to sustain development however tencent wasnt pleased with tihs they wanted more money so they shut it down.

[Nomad]

the cycle had terrible pve with everything super aggroing you. PVP was hit or miss and then hackers. The creature element in here is great. The pvp is horrible. Its janky, theres no hit detection I have seen. Firing my fully load glock into a guy with terrible shotgun aim to only keep shooting him while he reloads to get 1 tapped by said guy with shotgun after he has reloaded. Granted not all 17 rounds hit him or I don't know cause you know no hit detection. I'd Probably say 10-12 shots body and 2 or so shots head and nothing. This was all within 5 ft doing the fire fight tango. This is a tough game with merc vs merc vs alien, sentries, mines, mini bosses (coming), more environmental elements (coming). Like bro there is more here against mercs then anything else. Aliens have free roam.

You know i spent 20 grand on a yellow keycard. Open the door walked "1" step in and click landmine, at the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ door. 30 grand worth of equipment gone, now thats an escape from tarkov moment there.

[FuyuKun]

What kills F2P games are mostly cheaters,when i was playing The Cycle back then, i was bombarded with cheaters in the most games ,lots of players had issue with them,as long as i remember.... But i hope at least that LZ:E devs planning to add at least reliable anti-cheat.

[ProVegaGamer]

Originally posted by PyroCZ:

What kills F2P games are mostly cheaters,when i was playing The Cycle back then, i was bombarded with cheaters in the most games ,lots of players had issue with them,as long as i remember.... But i hope at least that LZ:E devs planning to add at least reliable anti-cheat.

Which is why people kept requesting that the devs either make the game offline playable or add a only PVE mode.