Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Yup, nothing more than a different approach to a common problem. Though, If we want to presume the opponent is competent with a good deck then it's equally valid to presume that they already have whatever starters they need among the other four non-Maxx C cards in their hand. In which case by not playing into Maxx C you all but guarantee your loss anyway, because of no setup and not enough interaction to stall them. Catch 22 I'd say.
For what it's worth, I do also assume my opponent is skilled until they have the opportunity to prove otherwise. It's just that in the question of what to spend a negate on, Maxx C is towards the bottom of my list well under whatever actual threat they might draw with it.