Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Then how should it be punished? I like the idea of slowly changing the color of the player's name till it turns red. Some fighting games do that for people who disconnect too often.
There's a world of difference between slow play because of shoddy networking and slow play from intentionally dragging out the game to style on or troll the opponent. So much difference that we shouldn't be using the same term for both. Instead let's call the latter and situations like it "Disrespectful Play", just to be clearer on what we're talking about. And I would agree, disrespectful play should be a punishable offense.
But this is Konami, so anything is possible. Like, I personally think the buttons don't actually report anything, anywhere and they're just there to make players feel good, like they're doing something. If Konami was actually interested in enforcing any kinds of rules, there would be more than just the 2 options under "Report."
Missions are not worth considering in my book. It's an outside influence that affects your gameplay, little different from having someone over your shoulder backseat dueling. Which is generally agreed to be poor manners anyway. Either the missions get done over the course of the duel or they do not and you have to play another round to get them done, either way should not impact what you're doing in the duel itself.
As for the other two examples, these are one instance where a chat in the game would actually be a legitimate benefit, as it's very easy to tell through such tabletalk when someone is BMing you and when someone's literally missed something or messed up their math. Even without it though, there's a very clear message being sent when they have lethal on board vs. your nothing and chose to move to end phase for multiple turns in a row. There is no excuse to be made in such cases, and they not only are a thing that happens but are the overwhelming majority of legitimate "slow play" cases. People do it on purpose.
tell me you've never read the official rule book without telling me you've never read the official rule book.
It is extremely and well clear cut defined. Aside from that, proving it online is a different matter. When you say "should we punish"...how exactly? *WE* aren't the ones that get to make that call. We have the means to report it. This isn't anything anyone here can do unless you want to throw a lot of money at konami and tell them to go fix the issue.
See, first off the official rulebook (found here[img.yugioh-card.com]) says absolutely nothing about "slow play" or even the amount of time a player should be granted per turn. What you're thinking of are Event rules, not game rules, and the particulars can vary between events and regions. For example, OCG mentions only the following for "Time-related etiquette":
That's it. And as you can see, there is no strict definition and is generally left up to arbitration by the judges at the event in question. Because a lot of the human element is removed in Master Duel, the definition must be both strict and explicit so that it is applied consistently and understood universally. It must be an absolute.
The most obvious punishment would be an escalating lockout from ranked play for offenders, with frequent offenders potentially being banned altogether. While this could potentially be an automated process, the sheer ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of some among our playerbase would mean false reports get filed often and innocent people get locked out of playing for no reason. Thus an appeal process would also be nessasary, which would have to be human-moderated to prevent manipulation of the system. It's a steep ask, hence why it's not done.
Point made. You really never read it and you are going off the assumption you're right. That isn't the official rule book I'm talking about. That's a starting guide. Master duel is FOR OFFICIAL TOURNAMENTS use:
THIS.[img.yugioh-card.com]
edit: I guess its on me for saying "rule book" when I should've said "tournament policy". Slow play is very clearly detailed and how it should be punished.
What clowns.