Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Why would they bother with that.
That aside, it would be nice to have something to the effect that when both players explicitely agree, then chat is possible. And each player can immediately turn it off again whenever he feels like.
That would make sense, but again, there will be at least one jurisdiction with crazy enough rules, especially regarding minors, that Konami cannot rule out completely to be held accountable.
Hence, they wont bother.
Do you think these games have to fill out some kinds of legal forms worldwide to make sure their in-game chat is in order with these hypothetical jurisdictions? No, it's a basic feature that's been in multiplayer games for decades. Unless your game is actively being used by an international human trafficking ring or something of that scale with plausible evidence that you were willfully allowing it, there is no law anywhere that would cause any kinds of problems whatsoever. And nothing even close to that could happen by letting you opt in to talking with your randomly matched opponent for the course of one duel before you go on to never see that person again. People already use the in-game name to write slurs, push political ideas, advertise their streams/porn, etc. If there was any law that cared about communication, this would also fall within it, and clearly nobody cares at any level of power