Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Current Meta is basically decided by how well you handle Runick. So if you can handle Runick you are probably good. IDK if any of those bosses are both untargetable and deal piercing but Chaos Max basically hard counters Runick so if you have anything similar you could probably do fine in the current Meta. Not sure bout branded though.
I just know my matches against them usually turn into bullying no matter what deck I am using unless they reach full power due to me not having any interruptions.
Sorry for resurrecting the posts here, but thought it wasn't worth making a new one just for this.
I used to play Blackwings about a decade ago, so I built a deck in master duel to try it out since I know how the deck works, and don't want to have to learn a deck that spends 20 minutes setting up a combo, even if it isn't as competitive as the meta decks.
That's true of ANY card that says you must control a specific monster, if it is face down the monster's name and type do not exist.
That's because the card you are referring to affects the player, not full armor master. YOU must discard a card to declare an attack, it has nothing to do with your monster.