Black Red-eye Dragon structural deck

[Dragon_Soul]

Would be nice if you can add this structural deck based on that classic dragon, those decks that you can buy 3 times for 500 gemns, please

[G3]

They could but, it would be a bad buy. They Red-Eyes cards are too disjointed to be a deck.

[Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!]

Only reason to do this is if the 3rd anniversary is Red-Eyes themed, otherwise no reason to do this

[Ghojhiuz]

I will teach make a red-eyes deck, use gemini cards, zombie support and red-eyes cards (deck 50-60 cards) if you know how to choose the cards your deck will be sovereign and kill quickly and deny and ban, just do not use against the decks common cheating in this game, katshira, labirinth etc what I would recommend is you to abandon this toxic game.

[Dragon_Soul]

引用自 Ghojhiuz：

I will teach make a red-eyes deck, use gemini cards, zombie support and red-eyes cards (deck 50-60 cards) if you know how to choose the cards your deck will be sovereign and kill quickly and deny and ban, just do not use against the decks common cheating in this game, katshira, labirinth etc what I would recommend is you to abandon this toxic game.

Do not forget tenpai decks aswell, braindead decks

[Ryoga]

Red-Eyes sure could use a Structure Deck as it is way too expensive for something that bad even if one would be interested in building it. It also needs a proper wave of support first as nothing they can set-up with in-archetype means is even remotely competitive (and with that I mean vs. other more casual archetypes).

引用自 Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!：

Only reason to do this is if the 3rd anniversary is Red-Eyes themed, otherwise no reason to do this

No real point in using Red-Eyes for the 3rd anniversary, even if they want to do the whole Yugi / Kaiba / Joey thing Flame Swordsman would be a significantly better choice here for multiple reasons.

[Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!]

引用自 Ryoga：

Red-Eyes sure could use a Structure Deck as it is way too expensive for something that bad even if one would be interested in building it. It also needs a proper wave of support first as nothing they can set-up with in-archetype means is even remotely competitive (and with that I mean vs. other more casual archetypes).

引用自 Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!：

Only reason to do this is if the 3rd anniversary is Red-Eyes themed, otherwise no reason to do this

No real point in using Red-Eyes for the 3rd anniversary, even if they want to do the whole Yugi / Kaiba / Joey thing Flame Swordsman would be a significantly better choice here for multiple reasons.

Nah see if we get Red-Eyes as the 3rd year anniversary they'll most likely take off Dragoon as a special reason to invest in the Structure Deck

[Merilirem]

引用自 Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!：

引用自 Ryoga：

Red-Eyes sure could use a Structure Deck as it is way too expensive for something that bad even if one would be interested in building it. It also needs a proper wave of support first as nothing they can set-up with in-archetype means is even remotely competitive (and with that I mean vs. other more casual archetypes).


No real point in using Red-Eyes for the 3rd anniversary, even if they want to do the whole Yugi / Kaiba / Joey thing Flame Swordsman would be a significantly better choice here for multiple reasons.

Nah see if we get Red-Eyes as the 3rd year anniversary they'll most likely take off Dragoon as a special reason to invest in the Structure Deck

Unless they print some kind of crazy fusion for Kaiba to contrast Dragoon, I don't see it. Blue Eyes just got stuff unrelated.

Though they really should give Red Eyes the full Support and make it into an actual functional archetype.

[bwebbuva]

I feel like there's a pretty strong concensus that Verte and Dragoon can't exist in the same banlist. If one leaves, the other arrives, and at the end of the day what good is Dragoon even going to do? Let rogue decks make a strong boss monster because they hard drew Red-Eyes Fusion in their opening hand? I'm curious if Dragoon could even work outside of just using it with Red-Eyes Fusion

[e-dood]

引用自 Merilirem：

引用自 Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!：

Nah see if we get Red-Eyes as the 3rd year anniversary they'll most likely take off Dragoon as a special reason to invest in the Structure Deck

Unless they print some kind of crazy fusion for Kaiba to contrast Dragoon, I don't see it. Blue Eyes just got stuff unrelated.

Though they really should give Red Eyes the full Support and make it into an actual functional archetype.

Honestly, I would like to see Red-Eyes get some decent support.

[Merilirem]

引用自 e-dood：

引用自 Merilirem：

Unless they print some kind of crazy fusion for Kaiba to contrast Dragoon, I don't see it. Blue Eyes just got stuff unrelated.

Though they really should give Red Eyes the full Support and make it into an actual functional archetype.

Honestly, I would like to see Red-Eyes get some decent support.

Most everyone who knows about Red Eyes would. Though few agree on exactly what it would look like.

[bluestar899]

Honestly I could see it happening in late 2025 or sometime in 2026 provided they include Red-Eyes Fullmetal Black Dragon and Max Metalmorph. So it'd come down to when we get the Metalmorph stuff from ROTA and how long they'd be willing to wait to throw them in a SD.

[76561198954155998]

引用自 Dragon_Soul：

Would be nice if you can add this structural deck based on that classic dragon, those decks that you can buy 3 times for 500 gemns, please

How bout no,

Less dm era garbage representation and pandering, the better off MD will be

[Ryoga]

引用自 EBlade3529：

引用自 Dragon_Soul：

Would be nice if you can add this structural deck based on that classic dragon, those decks that you can buy 3 times for 500 gemns, please

How bout no,

Less dm era garbage representation and pandering, the better off MD will be

Red-Eyes, as an archetype, is from GX.

[TXM]

It feels oddly intentional to me: us not seeing much Red-Eyes support lately. Think about the other "Joey" retrains we have seen: Time Wizard of Tomorrow and Hundred Dragon are some of the more recent ones I can think of, along with the Flame Swordsman link card. There's *another* new Yugi deck with Shining Sarcophagus - I think, looking at the patterns, Konami is trying to modernize as many nostalgic old cards as possible and now at the point of trying to be more liberal with the idea of "nostalgia". Which is cool, but I think in the process Red-Eyes has been seen as a deck which has got support more consistently through the years than it actually has in the form of cards like Darkness Metal Dragon and Zombie Dragon being a former box promo cover too.

I don't think it makes sense in MD now until a new wave of support to add cohesion to the archetype to at least make it possible for the deck to clear Gold consistently on ranked like most of the other structures can is added; and I don't think we will see that support because Konami has, to put it most charitably, inconsistent optics on matters like these.

[76561198954155998]

引用自 Ryoga：

Red-Eyes, as an archetype, is from GX.

And yet said archetype is legacy support for an overrated pile of vanilla trash from the most boring era of Yugioh ever...

less dm era pandering the better