安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
The point was you have unrealistic expectations from Konami and the game. I already told you that Konami isn't going to support old decks unless it makes them money. Konami doesn't make money if everyone keeps using the old stuff and none of the new stuff. This isn't a game where you get balance patches for your favorite character every couple of months. Konami sells you new characters and sunsets the old ones.
That's assuming they accepted and broke said agreement in the first place. There's is no way to make a deal like that in an online game without being able to communicate to the other player before hand. Again, you both have access to the same tools to win.
Keep doubling down on Genex being good pre-link 1. No projection here.
We can infer this the same way you believe in your imaginary rule against previous product.
Because you want to argue semantics. Here.
https://www.masterduelmeta.com/tournaments - The Master Duel results you want.
Everyone here uses it as a general board for the current game. Yourself included. Or, did you mean to confine your ideas that "fix" the game in your eyes to Master Duel only.
Having a resource system in YGO wasn't being said. It's that the Mana games (MtG,HS,DTCG) are more about balancing their games than YGO is. More so Hearthstone since it's digital only and can live errata a card if its a problem.
Have fun with your dungeons. Btw you're doing the thing you said you don't like doing. Arguing.
Halq made every deck op, lol. It was silly.
Do you know what a gentlemen's agreement is?
It is, literal skill issue.
You can, doesn't make it true nor does it have any relevance as to what I've said nor me "incapable of being wrong" like you clearly seem to think I am.
It is, it's like saying "the sky is blue". You yourself even admitted they don't care about older archetypes because they don't make money. So which is it? Do they care about older archetypes or do they not because money?
It's not semantics to expect Master Duel results in a forum about Master Duel. Thanks for the link I'll check it out, in the meantime do tournaments make up a significant portion of the game or is it the minority compared to ranked like in most other games? Because if it's, say, 3% of Master Duel games then my point about hardly anyone playing Spyral still stands.
No, clearly when I'm talking about fixing the game I'm talking about Duelists of the Roses and not the game the forum is made for.
Yes, obviously when I talk balance I'm talking about Master Duel, that's why almost all of my discussion in regards to the TCG and the OCG are either in relation to Master Duel, with a very small part of it being "oh well that's good/bad" based on whatever I happen to end up hearing about. I've repeatedly said that Master Duel should be more like the TCG because based on the banlist it sounds better, but you might be dismayed to hear I may be mistaken.
Cool, and?
I'd rather not, but you decided to instigate one with this... retort? Let's go with retort.
U know Zephyr like E-dood said a couple of weeks back. If u weren't so confrontational u would likely get along with about half the people here. Its just that u say some of the most ludicrous stuff sometimes. Things that really can't be defended but u double, triple & quadruple down on them for whatever reason. U make it way too ez for people to literally point and do the Simpsons laugh. U gotta stop playing yourself man.
I don't, you realize that argument was over me mentioning that Konami doesn't care about older archetypes.
I never said it was meta, I said it was playable which is not only not outlandish but true.
Then that's your fault for assuming I thought it was meta or rogue.
Which is perfectly fine as it is, just look at Synchron/Junk/Stardust's reliance on Junk Speeder. Both can be shut down easily but have a big payoff, it's high risk high reward.
You want to say this when you just got done insulting and berating me constantly during our argument? All the while ignoring that many of the people here including you that claim I'm confrontational while you people have done nothing but mock, insult, lie, slander, and patronize me?
Thanks for proving my previous point, that right there is why I'm incredulous when you bring this up as I was when E-dood did and find it unlikely that'd ever happen.
The only points that u continually prove is how wrong u are about half the things u say. Playable is strong Rogue, or Tier 4. That's literally what people mean by Rogue. Its strong enough to technically compete against Meta decks while not technically being a Meta choice.
Which Genex has NEVER BEEN. Its debatable as to whether it is now. Blue-Eyes has better overall support and it isn't making much headway either. Genex literally has ZERO results in tourney's so no. Its not playable, even now.
https://ygoprodeck.com/category/format/tournament%20meta%20decks?offset=0&name=genex
U can triple & quadruple down all u want. Doesn't change the results of another ridiculous thing u have said.
Then it's no wonder you an others have been getting so bent over me saying Genex is playable, because when I said playable I was referring to it being able to beat rogue or maybe even tier 3 provided the Genex player is good and lucky enough with their draws rather than your definition. No, Genex could never beat meta not now and certainly not back then.
I'd point out that doesn't cover Master Duel, but frankly I'm just glad I figured out what part you were having trouble understanding.
Good thing I don't care what you or others in this forum think is "ridiculous" then, so if it's all the same to you I'm gonna grind some gems to pick up that Live Twin bundle.
An argument takes 2. It doesn't matter who started it or who's right, you're actively and presently helping continue it. This decision on your part to continue arguing flies in the face of your claim that you hate arguing, and implies that at the very least you hate being wrong more than you hate arguing. Considering your history and how regular of a thing this is with anyone and everyone that voices any level of disagreement with you, it seems far more like you're simply spoiling for fights and love arguing despite your insistence to the contrary.
Actions speak louder than words. Your actions do not align with your words. Fix this.
By that logic people dealing with pest problems just like killing and expelling pests for no reason.
No, just because when someone posts drivel in response to my posts I respond back doesn't mean I like having to waste time dealing with whatever cookie cutter Yugioh player decided to instigate an argument.
My actions are in response to people being a nuisance, it's not my job to fix your or another's belligerent behavior.
You said it yourself, it's not your job to "fix" other people's behavior. And yet you try to, engaging with the "drivel" of the day instead of ignoring it and letting it roll off your back. Not every little thing warrants a response, and in trying to respond to every little thing you only "lower" yourself to "their" level.
The sheer arrogance in your vocabulary choice alone is frankly incredible, from the blatant comparison of other people to insects to the assertion that you're smarter than anyone else here. Reminds me of why exactly I blocked you, thanks for that.