master duel coin toss rigged

[76561199243158225]

For a week master duel has been making me going lossing the coin toss alot and because of that rigged coin decider I was demoted back to tier 5 diamond and this isnt about my skills or I should use a going second deck I have been losing too much and every time it is ruin my hand momentum That I end up with a hand going first while I am going second.

[itzRiceKrispies]

I'm sorry to hear that Falconsamurai85.

[Merilirem]

Such is RNG. Math is funny like that. It always ruins someones day.

[Unknown Samurai]

Originally posted by falconsamurai85:

For a week master duel has been making me going lossing the coin toss alot and because of that rigged coin decider I was demoted back to tier 5 diamond and this isnt about my skills or I should use a going second deck I have been losing too much and every time it is ruin my hand momentum That I end up with a hand going first while I am going second.

https://youtu.be/M1p4LUpSBW4?si=E02_Yu42si8fUba9

[76561199243158225]

Originally posted by itzRiceKrispies:

I'm sorry to hear that Falconsamurai85.

thanks much appreciated, It is annoying and it has caused me to be on a losing streak.

[76561199243158225]

Originally posted by Unknown Samurai:

Originally posted by falconsamurai85:

For a week master duel has been making me going lossing the coin toss alot and because of that rigged coin decider I was demoted back to tier 5 diamond and this isnt about my skills or I should use a going second deck I have been losing too much and every time it is ruin my hand momentum That I end up with a hand going first while I am going second.

https://youtu.be/M1p4LUpSBW4?si=E02_Yu42si8fUba9

Very true the coin toss is sinister and needs to change.

[76561199543893354]

So like, you think, some Konami worker is sitting there and instead of thinking of more horrible cards or their own vocation, they make you lose the coin toss in every game?

[Eisen]

how important are you to think that someone in Konami has a personal grudge against you and decided to make you lose every coin toss?

[.]

Though I don't believe the coin toss is rigged against certain players, the coin is definitely not 50/50. The game should change the coin instead to rock-paper-scissors to give each player an interaction which cannot be determined by a computer's RNG.

[Terminal Desolation]

Originally posted by Garbage:

Though I don't believe the coin toss is rigged against certain players, the coin is definitely not 50/50. The game should change the coin instead to rock-paper-scissors to give each player an interaction which cannot be determined by a computer's RNG.

what do you mean by this?

if the coin toss is not truly 50/50 as you claim, then logic would dictate that you must believe it is rigged in some way - what way could you possibly be envisioning to have the coin toss be rigged, and yet not rigged simultaneously?

[76561199243158225]

Originally posted by Garbage:

Though I don't believe the coin toss is rigged against certain players, the coin is definitely not 50/50. The game should change the coin instead to rock-paper-scissors to give each player an interaction which cannot be determined by a computer's RNG.

Yes, finally someone gets it. A rock, paper, scissors would be better than the coin toss decider.

[76561199243158225]

Originally posted by Eisen:

how important are you to think that someone in Konami has a personal grudge against you and decided to make you lose every coin toss?

I caused about over 500 people rage quit in the duel.

[76561199543893354]

Originally posted by Garbage:

Though I don't believe the coin toss is rigged against certain players, the coin is definitely not 50/50. The game should change the coin instead to rock-paper-scissors to give each player an interaction which cannot be determined by a computer's RNG.

How can you tell? Given how chance works, you absolutely can toss a coin 100 times and lose every time without anything being rigged, your chance of that is just very low.

Rock-paper-scissors would still be cool though.

[.]

Originally posted by sr5123rs:

Originally posted by Garbage:

Though I don't believe the coin toss is rigged against certain players, the coin is definitely not 50/50. The game should change the coin instead to rock-paper-scissors to give each player an interaction which cannot be determined by a computer's RNG.

How can you tell? Given how chance works, you absolutely can toss a coin 100 times and lose every time without anything being rigged, your chance of that is just very low.

Rock-paper-scissors would still be cool though.

When it comes to people, I always expect another angle. This applies especially to anyone who acts in corporate interest. The coin can very well be rigged, and it very well could not be either. To eliminate the risk entirely of the former, I think RPS is a far more trustworthy system, as it ensures a far greater outcome that the end user is responsible for whatever the outcome is...as opposed to relying on even the smallest chance that the coin tosses could be rigged based on an outside algorithm.

[76561199543893354]

Originally posted by Garbage:

When it comes to people, I always expect another angle. This applies especially to anyone who acts in corporate interest. The coin can very well be rigged, and it very well could not be either. To eliminate the risk entirely of the former, I think RPS is a far more trustworthy system, as it ensures a far greater outcome that the end user is responsible for whatever the outcome is...as opposed to relying on even the smallest chance that the coin tosses could be rigged based on an outside algorithm.

Aye, now that's a big brain take. Can't argue with that.

[HeraldOfOpera]

Originally posted by Garbage:

Originally posted by sr5123rs:

How can you tell? Given how chance works, you absolutely can toss a coin 100 times and lose every time without anything being rigged, your chance of that is just very low.

Rock-paper-scissors would still be cool though.

When it comes to people, I always expect another angle. This applies especially to anyone who acts in corporate interest. The coin can very well be rigged, and it very well could not be either. To eliminate the risk entirely of the former, I think RPS is a far more trustworthy system, as it ensures a far greater outcome that the end user is responsible for whatever the outcome is...as opposed to relying on even the smallest chance that the coin tosses could be rigged based on an outside algorithm.

Except if they were willing to cheat, there's no in-game chat to prove they're rigging RPS so long as they don't do it in the irrelevant Duel Rooms. Also, if both players share a braincell they may end up never getting to actually duel.