Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
25 cards on the grave, 5 back row and 4 monsters with effects. This is my experience of the game.
Ah yes, the kind of posts that I see one of and open the game to play my Fire King.
I honestly started playing Tearlaments again because of the post complaining about them. I've been on break for a while now. Going to terrorize some Silvers.
Fire King Snake-Eyes Horus Super Poly Albaz
The only thing I don't like about fire kings is that they can keep playing on the opponents turn, but a lot of decks can do this. Its not even about it being too strong, I just hate waiting for my turn to begin and then they just start from the top using all the same effects once again. IMO, this it probably where the game is headed so its no use complaining, in the future there may come a point where there is no "my turn" "your turn", its just consecutive chains where players respond to each others effects..
It's way faster to just quit the duel and get into the next one even if the deck is fine.
Also, what makes Fire Kings dumb balance-wise is Snake-Eyes, Fire Kings themselves are perfectly fine as is.