This meta sucks.

[Knud den Store 🧙‍♂]

Most games are decided by handtraps, I say most because the rest is decided by the coin toss. I think we seriously need to think of unbanning Merrli and the Ishizu cards, that meta was more enjoyable.

[Terminal Desolation]

Have hope, fellow. Tear is still playable. I've made it to D1 off a relatively standard 40 card brew. I'll take it up to Master and we'll see if I can max out from there, but the deck is still functional. Having played it for awhile, I think Merrli coming back would legitimately break the deck. I wouldn't mind Ishizus all to 1, or getting another Havniss/Scheiren, or even my Sullieks back, though.

[Zelwy]

I miss the Floo meta

[Geno Saurer]

引用自 LeCroix：

I miss the Floo meta

Tell me you're joking. I can't even play the game against floo players. Literally stealing my turn to play their cards.

[Astrallight]

引用自 LeCroix：

I miss the Floo meta

Ifyou are a floo player then you properly do.

[Zelwy]

Eldlich zombie world player back then, floo was very fun to duel against and a easy win, so I liked that meta.

[Knud den Store 🧙‍♂]

引用自 LeCroix：

Eldlich zombie world player back then, floo was very fun to duel against and a easy win, so I liked that meta.

I remember making Floo players miserable with U.A. good times, especially the ones that rely on floodgates like dimensional fisure.

I remember keeping one at bay with just penalty box while bricking, when Apex avian finally destroyed Penalty Box the floo player got that I was bricking the whole time and was like "oh no..." and scooped.

I do not have the UR to make full Floo but it is an interesting deck, because they SEEM to have a lot of gas and resources so it messes with control decks a bit but they only have like 3 heavy hitters and once you beat the second one, well things start looking grim. Simultaneously Floo is a great anti-meta deck. Awesome deck.

[Soji]

the mirror is actually enjoyable imo for SE but it is suffocating most of everything being in the state its in. I just play on edopro when im trying to play something else because its basically impossible to vs anything but SE and Tear after diamond.

[Papa Shekels]

It's still better than superheavy format where your only chance to win going second was to draw the one exact hand trap that ends their turn, or a 3-card board breaker combo. And at least snake-eye is relatively beatable by other decks to the point it's not quite a tier zero format from the look of things. But it's still ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ miserable regardless.

I wouldn't mind them bringing back merrli and maybe one kelbek, but if they do then elf has to finally go. No point going from one oppressive meta straight into another

[Filipino Enjoyer]

yeah so don't play and let the player count plummet so konami has to do the bare minimum to make the game not ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

[Fatality]

Merrli can come back if they ban elf. Sending it and reviving it every turn? That doesn't sound right. Generic shufflers and millers that can mess with both players' deck and GY should have never existed. They are beyond broken. Especially when they are quick effect banish as cost.

[draconicepic]

引用自 Fatality：

Merrli can come back if they ban elf. Sending it and reviving it every turn? That doesn't sound right. Generic shufflers and millers that can mess with both players' deck and GY should have never existed. They are beyond broken. Especially when they are quick effect banish as cost.

They should ban Elf regardless. It is constantly becomes a problem anytime someone finds a way to abuse a level/rank/link 2. Snake Eyes is the current deck abusing it.

[Tempest Fox3]

The current meta may be pretty heavy on the hand traps but the answer is not bringing back tier 0 tear meta.

[Astrallight]

Elf should have been banned already back in the Tear meta.

[Terminal Desolation]

引用自 Fatality：

Merrli can come back if they ban elf. Sending it and reviving it every turn? That doesn't sound right. Generic shufflers and millers that can mess with both players' deck and GY should have never existed. They are beyond broken. Especially when they are quick effect banish as cost.

People forget you can still send Merrli off Sprind and go off from there. Yes Elf was strong because it meant you could guaranteed mill 3 on your opponent's turn but the biggest synergy was Sprind guaranteeing the Merrli mill.

[Fatality]

引用自 draconicepic：

引用自 Fatality：

Merrli can come back if they ban elf. Sending it and reviving it every turn? That doesn't sound right. Generic shufflers and millers that can mess with both players' deck and GY should have never existed. They are beyond broken. Especially when they are quick effect banish as cost.

They should ban Elf regardless. It is constantly becomes a problem anytime someone finds a way to abuse a level/rank/link 2. Snake Eyes is the current deck abusing it.

I agree and disagree at the same time and it's only because I like Elf as a card. This would make spright even weaker. I haven't used Elf in other decks, but yes for balancing purposes it should be banned.

引用自 Terminal Desolation：

引用自 Fatality：

Merrli can come back if they ban elf. Sending it and reviving it every turn? That doesn't sound right. Generic shufflers and millers that can mess with both players' deck and GY should have never existed. They are beyond broken. Especially when they are quick effect banish as cost.

People forget you can still send Merrli off Sprind and go off from there. Yes Elf was strong because it meant you could guaranteed mill 3 on your opponent's turn but the biggest synergy was Sprind guaranteeing the Merrli mill.

Banning elf is understandable, but sprind will make spright useless. Milling it once is fine. Constantly bringing it back is not. Sprind is a good card as well, but not nearly as good as elf. I don't think it's worth banning.