Top tier ban list

[LokiTheVile]

Thank god they semi-limited unicorn. It was truly the pestilence of this game. Without it being as prevalent, now snake eyes can stand a chance against kashtira.

Also thank god for konami semi-limiting shs wagon and nadir servant. Cards that were truly turning this game into an unplayable nightmare.

My only complaints for this banlist is for the life of me, I still can't understand why they bought birth back up to 2 instead of banning it, and why the snake eyes haven't gotten more support. I think we should write a petition to konami to increase the limit of snake eyes ash, diabelle star and wanted to 4, just for those cards.

[CH∀OS]

Don't forget that Dimension Shifter is still around.

[Hexi]

Feels like indirect nerfs and pretty minor nerfs, kash semi limit will probably kill or weaken the kash package in snake-eyes and nadir servant will weaken lab and branded slightly. I agree with the kash hit but I think the nadir servant hit was weird and they should of definitely hit the actual archetypes rather than these engines.

Edit: and taking away 1 of 12 starters in super heavy sams isn't going to change the deck much.

[LokiTheVile]

Originally posted by gameing:

Feels like indirect nerfs and pretty minor nerfs, kash semi limit will probably kill or weaken the kash package in snake-eyes and nadir servant will weaken lab and branded slightly. I agree with the kash hit but I think the nadir servant hit was weird and they should of definitely hit the actual archetypes rather than these engines.

Edit: and taking away 1 of 12 starters in super heavy sams isn't going to change the deck much.

The problem is they're attempting to hurt a meta deck by hurting tools outside of the archetype... which just hurts the archetypes that they belong to. Nadir servant shouldn't have any place on the ban list. But it gets to pay for the sins of labrynth. As a lab main, I don't see why nadir servant needs to get hit, just hit lab, even though I don't think it needs a hit in the first place.

Kashtira, a deck that already suffers from serious consistency issues has to become even more bricky because of snake eyes. And dogmatika loses a consistency card as well.

[Fatality]

Had a good laugh with the list tbh. Didn't expect anything better, but not that bad either, even by scamnmoney. It will be another month of 80% snake eyes, 10% labrynth, 5% superheavy and 5% whatever decks. If they refuse to make meaningful limits to the strongest decks they should just not make stupidly broken cards in the first place. It's not that hard. Until then we can keep laughing at least.

[76561199658166398]

I think that Fleur's Baroone should be limited, when a card is on the field that blocks almost all defensive effects against it from hand with its effects, it becomes a bit unbalancing and even allows you to banish one of the opponent's field cards per turn, if we put three of them on the starting table...we will have to have three cards in our hand to nullify their effects, otherwise the fight will die there in the first turn .
Decks built with only anti-game cards should also be banned, "C" Maxx and Ash Blossom are good cards and essential defensively and nullify effects and acquire more cards in the hand, they are normal, I don't think they need to be banned , maybe I can be limited to two cards each .
Snake Eye is bizarre when we destroy all the cards on the field and they all come back from the graveyard, I hate it lol

[Cinnamoon_dragon]

Konami: "It seems we were wrong when we removed the limit on Nadir servant, now it's semi limited again". With the exception of the rainbow magician, this is a completely formal ban list. Just for comparison, when Runick got into the top 10 of the Duelist cup, they practically killed the deck, when the top 1 player is Labrynth, they didn't do any direct hits. I think this should mean something to those who somehow believe that Konami doesn't listen to the fan base. In the case of Runick, there was a crowd of peasants with pitchforks and shouts of burning the witch; in the case of Labrynth, many fans said they didn't want the deck to be nerfed.

[Fatality]

Originally posted by Static-ghost:

Konami: "It seems we were wrong when we removed the limit on Nadir servant, now it's semi limited again". With the exception of the rainbow magician, this is a completely formal ban list. Just for comparison, when Runick got into the top 10 of the Duelist cup, they practically killed the deck, when the top 1 player is Labrynth, they didn't do any direct hits. I think this should mean something to those who somehow believe that Konami doesn't listen to the fan base. In the case of Runick, there was a crowd of peasants with pitchforks and shouts of burning the witch; in the case of Labrynth, many fans said they didn't want the deck to be nerfed.

The guy that got first place at the DC said that lab sucks. I don't know if that has anything to do with the fact that lab didn't get any direct hit, bit whatever. Lab itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps..

[Cinnamoon_dragon]

Originally posted by Fatality:

Lab itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps..

Runick itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps /s
Well, I have no reason to complain, I have a Labrynth deck, it looks like Konami wants to sell a future box with Butler support for Labrynth.

[LokiTheVile]

Originally posted by Static-ghost:

Originally posted by Fatality:

Lab itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps..

Runick itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps /s
Well, I have no reason to complain, I have a Labrynth deck, it looks like Konami wants to sell a future box with Butler support for Labrynth.

Lab really isn't that good. I mean of the opponent doesn't have an ash, they're going to be steam rolled, but they're a deck that crumbles in the face of a single ash. If anything deserves a hit from the lab tool box it would be transaction roll back. That card is a little too good.

[Cinnamoon_dragon]

Originally posted by LokiTheVile:

they're a deck that crumbles in the face of a single ash

I remember the time when Branded players wrote something similar too. Pure innocent souls.

[SilentFOX]

can we atleast get sanctifier banned? ugh

[Hexi]

Originally posted by SilentFOX:

can we atleast get sanctifier banned? ugh

Sanctifier in itself isn't that strong, it is just broken in enabling the puppet lock. I guess semi limiting servant helps because that card is a 1 card puppet lock.

[Fatality]

Originally posted by Static-ghost:

Originally posted by Fatality:

Lab itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps..

Runick itself is not that good. It just gets carried by the ability to abuse the good traps /s
Well, I have no reason to complain, I have a Labrynth deck, it looks like Konami wants to sell a future box with Butler support for Labrynth.

Pure runick is better than Lab without the annoying traps tbh. What does lab do without d barrier, the virus, rollback and maybe the floodgates? Pop 1 in hand and 1 on field? Runick can have some interaction with the opponent and banish the deck at the same while going +3.

[Ryoga]

Bad list, just unban Master Peace and Dragoon already you PTSD ridden cowards! Also, take Monster Reborn off the list while you're at it.

[Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!]

Snake-Eyes does have more support, get ready for Anti-Spell Fragrance on legs