Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Meta means the decks you anticipate to encounter the most often, the most popular decks. It's because in theory since you know what you're going to encounter, you plan around tech cards to counter it (you know, META gaming), or even straight up use a deck that's anti-meta (Like META gaming).
It's not about efficiency or how powerful a deck is. Meta could literally be all t4 decks if that's what everyone was going to use. It's just common sense though people use the strongest decks they can. Being strong doesn't make a deck meta, what makes it meta is its usage rate.
There is nothing wrong with refusing to play it, and nothing wrong with choosing to play it, but people complaining about a meta as if it isn't an inevitable part of a competitive game are outing themselves as having no clue what they are talking about
There will be no meta because everyone's card pool is determined by RNG.
Wouldn't it just be way easier and make more sense to just make a sealed draft mode? Giving every player a unique banlist is kinda...yeah...
edit: I would honestly love to have master pack sealed tournament, 1000 gem entry, give 12 packs instead of 10.
No we don't you are the only one who cares about this and what you ask is functionally impossible to manage to put it simply as possible.
There would infact be a meta it would just be what packs are best to go into just like you started this thing with floo a low rarity archetype from a selection pack its absolutely ideal for this challenge of yours a meta if you would infact that would most likely be the result archetypes from mid to low rarity from selection packs because they are easier to pull.
Man...I'm too old to know what is trolling and serious and everything else on this board... Thanks for the heads up, I appreciate it
I'm playing Mikanko now (the deck that Raven also plays). But you're right that there will probably be a "best secret pack" to go for, and it'll probably be Rikka Sunavalon, which will no longer have to worry about playing under Maxx "C." Swordsoul is another deck that could become popular because it recently got a Secret Pack.
No but the meta decks you would face are at much lower power then whatever tier 1 decks we got now that just auto wins cause of powercreep. VS is pretty much a deck that shows what happens when card creators craft a deck that does almost everything and has nearly no weakness. Lab handripping two cards within 2 rounds and then search D-Barrier with Lady. Branded now got new puppet lock.
People will get tired of this. People want a format where its not just floodgates and the usual 5 decks that stuns you and tells you you dont get to play.
They already did some great festivals in the past they easy could have keep running but no they want you to get destroyed by meta day after day in ranked and force you to only craft meta decks to have a chance to deal with it.
Also a reason why this game only got 15000 players on average. That says alot. They could easy double or tripple that amount if they actually cared about banning OP blowout cards and easy to use floodgates including banning Max C.
No we dont. Then it would just be whoever are lucky to pull the best cards that wins. Just because you are obsessed with your non-craft challange you could just stick to your Twitter profile instead of bragging about it here non-stop does not mean we need one.