Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
KFC is a control deck, not a combo deck.
And if you aren't playing Floodgates in it, then I sure hope you aren't playing the walking floodgate himself, Empem, or are you a hypocrite?
combo > floodgate
By your logic, Anti-Spell Fragrance or Dimension Barrier aren't floodgates either, right?
And no, KFC is less of a combo deck than Sky Striker is.
Control decks =/= Floodgate.deck, Floodgate.dek = Stun decks
For the sort of person who tries to Ash Dangers, floodgates will function much more consistently. And we all know that person exists.
And that's why I splashed in Final Attack Orders.
Requiring more clicks doesn't make decks any more complex or harder to play.
That's why meta decks revolve around using control effects to stop their opponent from playing cards to fight back. It's simple, it's easy, and it prevents the need for adaptive play.
Floodgates aren't really any better in terms of skill or thought required.
But usually, they're more vulnerable, and the counterplay to them is more plentiful. So they're not as bad to play against.
Not to mention how they don't engage in as much Slow Play.
Due to the powercreep that has been going on, where duels are usually over by turn 3, with one person being unable to play-
Adaptive play, risk management, and interactive gameplay has kind of dwindled in this game. Those are the type of things that I believe could require skill or knowledge.
Giving people more chance to draw outs, and creating back-and-forth gameplay is a good thing, IMO.
Spending 10 minutes playing a game taking multiple turns is just more fun than spending 10 minutes watching your opponent play solitaire during one turn~
Making it so that having a monster in defense position is flat-out not an option will also work.
Ah right, unless it sets 5 pass and relies on floodgates, it's not a control deck in this guy's mind.
On a side note, I'm making a ghoti/spright deck. All I need left is the field spell. Will be interesting to see how it goes.
Regardless of everything, the one thing that's always blown my mind, is how people will literally spend months and YEARS on a forum for a game they either hate, or currently don't play/not enjoying and play infrequently. I cannot fathom being so unhappy all the time, that spending any time on a forum for something I no longer enjoy, makes sense.
Especially when on top of that, no amount of debates/complaining on most Steam game forums changes anything for the game.
Easy there, you'll get the "stop complaining about people complaining" squad after you XD