Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You get to choose Blue Eyes as your starter deck and DM got a stuckture deck but Red Eyes is just getting a zombie deck no one plays.
And at the same time those players are still cooping about Dragoon is still banned cause they want him in thier deck.
Honestly been wondering is the true Red Eyes black dragon isn't Albaz. Feels like he took everything red eyes wanted and ran with it. Literal red eyes black dragon. Least they could do if give red eyes its own mirror jade equivalent.
The whole thing just seems like a missed opportunity unless someone at Konami knows about some legacy support for an anniversary coming we don't know about. I mean maybe they are planning it like that. They did Dark Magician like that too. Kept it way overdue just for the anniversary.