Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Even if Tearlament and Spright disappeared tomorrow, we'd just be back to Adamacipator, Chaos, and Dragon Link creating unbreakable boards. I will take Tearlament any day over 5+ negates where you can only win by "Drawing the Out." Considering that Tearlament isn't Tier-0 anymore and the last Dkayed Meta Weekly Tournament was so varied with Tearlament not even in the finals, it probably won't get too many more hits. It's likely that Kelbek going to 1 will be the next Tearlament hit.
As to another point you made, pretty much everyone is tired of Maxx "C" making the game sacky and how often if feels like it appears in players despite the odds. I've personally have had multiple games recently where my opponent activated Maxx "C" back to back.
If you got dead hands in 7/10 games then you build your deck wrong.
just remember that everytime you lose a coin toss your opponent won his first after playing 4 games losing it.
I won 3 coin tosses in a raw yesterday just to lose it again twice in a raw. Thats just how RNG is.
And you dont want to improve your deck so why should people keep listening to your rants ?
Unless you call making a 60 card deck to lower the chance of drawing the 1 off "improving"