Runick is not healthy for a best of one Format runick to stronck u cant play counters^^

[Vardrag]

In a best of one u always play your kind of deck u maybe add a harpies(flederwish) but u shouldnt add too much too counter a deck in a best of one after gold its kind of 90 % after gold rest is albaz

[Papa Shekels]

if it's too strong, play more counters against it. If you can't "afford" to run more counters in your deck, runick isn't that strong. Diversity is good for the game, cutting out anything that your deck specifically can't deal with is not healthy for it

[Paulo Ramos]

Skill issue. Runick is not even at the top 3 best decks.

[Arkew Von Greffer]

your deck can't counter all deck.

if you add imperial iron wall / chaos hunter. your deck gonna have more chance vs runnick in the cost of being less good vs any other deck who not rely on banning.

ressult choas hunter and iron wall gonna become dead card in your hand or field vs any oppenent who not banish.

pick your poison deal more vs runick or deal more vs any other ppl

[skill issue]

the fun is not even started, wait for spright and enjoy

[Astrallight]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Papa Shekels:

if it's too strong, play more counters against it. If you can't "afford" to run more counters in your deck, runick isn't that strong. Diversity is good for the game, cutting out anything that your deck specifically can't deal with is not healthy for it

You should not be forced to pick up cards that counter only one deck. Those cards will just be dead cards when you face someone els that dont play Runic.

[Nat. 1]

There are currently 3 decks that are stornger than Runick stun and A LOT more for all other Runick variants...This will change on monday, but that deck at least doesn't run any floodgates.

[Merilirem]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Astrallight:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Papa Shekels:

if it's too strong, play more counters against it. If you can't "afford" to run more counters in your deck, runick isn't that strong. Diversity is good for the game, cutting out anything that your deck specifically can't deal with is not healthy for it

You should not be forced to pick up cards that counter only one deck. Those cards will just be dead cards when you face someone els that dont play Runic.

Actually thats entirely normal in competitive card games. You can't be expect to compete in ranked if you aren't building your decks with the current meta in mind. We don't have side decks so it hurts but regardless you need to run your anti whatever the biggest obstacle is cards. This can mean anything from the most common strategies to the decks that hard counter yours. Whatever it is you counter it to play in ranked and win more than not.

You don't have to do this of course. You can lose. You can use a completely different deck which counters the meta innately. You can just hope RNG favors you. What you can't do is play ranked and expect your same old deck to be good at all times. If you want to play without this consideration you can go play casual. There you can scoop without worry when you encounter Runick.

[Papa Shekels]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Astrallight:

You should not be forced to pick up cards that counter only one deck. Those cards will just be dead cards when you face someone els that dont play Runic.

Nobody is forcing you to do anything. You can just take the loss when you get a bad matchup. Or you can adapt to the meta and use cards that help you win. But backrow hate counters many decks, not sure how this silly meme has persisted for so long in the yugioh community, but feigning ignorance does not make the issue go away

[Bad Distraction Carnifex]

Every format has this problem. If you really, really hate Runick you can literally include EEV + Heavenly and auto win games. EEV is complete ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ as a card.

[wildnike]

>When the meta has one good backrow deck

[Cinnamoon_dragon]

I think the devs should definitely nerf Runiсk, it's not healthy for the game to have more decks that don't care about special summoning and Maxx C.

[𝔼ℂℂℍ𝕀 ℤ𝕆ℕ𝔼]

Ignore the clowns that say runick is fine, they are braindead and have zero idea about basic game balance.

Morons actually tell people to put in cards specifically to face this deck that cause you to brick and make you lose in other match ups instead of just admitting that runick is unhealthy for a best of 1 format.

News flash the field spell is broken and all the deck does is play cancer cards that dont let your opponent do anything. It doesn't belong in this format.

[R Valeman 37]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Vardrag:

In a best of one u always play your kind of deck u maybe add a harpies(flederwish) but u shouldnt add too much too counter a deck in a best of one after gold its kind of 90 % after gold rest is albaz

Because lack of duel rules....there no counter for since they can easliy negate it...

[FlintX]

Runick is just a silly annoying deck that dies to a single monster card as Silent Swordman. It just cringe dueling one really.

Deck design, quality and skill ceiling over the past 6 years in this game became pretty disappointing. All new releases has be nothing more than either gimmick ruberish to prevent the opponent from playing the game, like Floowanderize and Runick. Or straight up braindead decks that just requires you to keep pressing "Yes" prompts to get a victory. Such as Branded.

[Nanikoresky]

who ever play that deck has no friend, just sayin. almost as annoying as eldritch, yes i am salty cause almost every time i meet these decks, they'll always took 8-10 min per game whether i loose or not.