are these player cant think? it casual match not any rank match why so hard try to win.

[karred]

i go casual hoping casual but no all i meet are bunch of winning starve player on CASUAL dude READ casual dude casual if u so much want to win go normal match. i was using testing deck with no intention of winning that why i go casual. but dude READ it casual . CASUAL

[Merilirem]

That's not what casual means. Casual just means no stakes. There is no mode where victory isn't the point nor will there ever be. Feel free to test decks but people in casual might be there to test Meta decks too and thus they will try to win.

[Zelwy]

Originally posted by Merilirem:

That's not what casual means. Casual just means no stakes. There is no mode where victory isn't the point nor will there ever be. Feel free to test decks but people in casual might be there to test Meta decks too and thus they will try to win.

I dont think that is how most of the community or casual players consider what casual is though.

[Merilirem]

Originally posted by SirCroix:

Originally posted by Merilirem:

That's not what casual means. Casual just means no stakes. There is no mode where victory isn't the point nor will there ever be. Feel free to test decks but people in casual might be there to test Meta decks too and thus they will try to win.

I dont think that is how most of the community or casual players consider what casual is though.

It absolutely isn't what they think it is. Hence why I try to correct them on the meaning of casual in a game. Casual has only ever mean't random and without consequence. Feel free to surrender and expect people of high and low ability. This idea that you could make a mode where people don't try to win is honestly strange to me since victory has been the point of the game from the start. My casual games with friends on the playground were more serious than people seem to want here. Half of them consider a competent deck to be try harding.

[This is a house]

If you have no intention of winning, why does losing bother you at all? Because I think losing is what's bothering you.

[karred]

cause i cant test deck duh

[Merilirem]

Originally posted by karred:

cause i cant test deck duh

Sound like maybe you should be testing it in solo mode against AI's for now. Losing duels to tryhards is how you test decks once they run somewhat. I build all my decks by climbing ranked. No better way to know what actually works.

Losing is part of testing a deck. Its how you know if it actually works or not.

[karred]

oh can u change the loaner deck?

[Zelwy]

Originally posted by Merilirem:

It absolutely isn't what they think it is. Hence why I try to correct them on the meaning of casual in a game. Casual has only ever mean't random and without consequence. Feel free to surrender and expect people of high and low ability. This idea that you could make a mode where people don't try to win is honestly strange to me since victory has been the point of the game from the start. My casual games with friends on the playground were more serious than people seem to want here. Half of them consider a competent deck to be try harding.

Not to offend, but community choose what stuff means inside their own community/game, most casual players consider meta (what is meta at the moment) to not be casual (since meta is by default the most competitive strategies at the moment), and if most people consider that then it is what it is.

meta deck cannot be a casual deck, since most people consider a casual deck by default a deck that is not what is the most competitive at the moment/meta.

And I will got a step further by saying that is the group associated by the activity (in this case casual players) the ones deserving the last words about it.

[karred]

so what consider meta atm? is doll deck wich consist 0/0 atk and def is consider meta? dude it trying deck

[Merilirem]

Originally posted by SirCroix:

Originally posted by Merilirem:

It absolutely isn't what they think it is. Hence why I try to correct them on the meaning of casual in a game. Casual has only ever mean't random and without consequence. Feel free to surrender and expect people of high and low ability. This idea that you could make a mode where people don't try to win is honestly strange to me since victory has been the point of the game from the start. My casual games with friends on the playground were more serious than people seem to want here. Half of them consider a competent deck to be try harding.

Not to offend, but community choose what stuff means inside their own community/game, most casual players consider meta (what is meta at the moment) to not be casual (since meta is by default the most competitive strategies at the moment), and if most people consider that then it is what it is.

meta deck cannot be a casual deck, since most people consider a casual deck by default a deck that is not what is the most competitive at the moment/meta.

And I will got a step further by saying that is the group associated by the activity (in this case casual players) the ones deserving the last words about it.

This is only correct when the group itself is capable of defining it. The word casual may mean something to the group but that does not mean anything called casual follows the groups mentality. The group has zero control over the casual mode even if they did agree on the meaning which is debatable.

Konami should have called it Unranked. That's all I can say about this. If you want to have casual duels and define them that way the rooms exist for that very purpose. You can't create a truly casual mode that doesn't have some sort of moderation beyond what is possible via a queue. The best you can do is ask Konami for multiple format choices to be implemented when queuing up for casual and rooms.

[karred]

yeah like konami even care