Do you think Super polymerization is fair?

[76561199279370692]

I honestly do not mind it that much, except when used on your turn when it is face down. like if they go first they sacrifice your stuff and unless you have the luckiest hand ever you lose. Not sure if everyone else thinks it is fine, but I think it is too strong, especially when they only sacrifice your stuff and they get to keep their cards. Maybe would be okay if it required one of the users creatures to be sacrificed.

[Angel]

you should be careful what you summon if you suspect super poly especially with dark monsters, like it's not very good versus swordsoul for example because the most generic super poly targets won't work

[Lasagna]

Superpoly is a powerful board breaker for removing immune to everything/negate monsters.

it's extremely healthy for the game to exist as it's one more tool to remove overpowered boss monsters.

It's no more unfair than forbidden droplet, dark ruler no more, kaijus/lava golems/ra sphere mode/underworld goddess.

[EXO]

Super Poly is fine, it depends too much on the format. Against decks like SwordSoul is not good, but once we get the rest of the Branded support, is going to become a staple.

[Rainy days.]

Be a pro and just tribute something they own for a Kaiju, then use Super Poly on That

[HeraldOfOpera]

Originally posted by Rainy days.:

Be a pro and just tribute something they own for a Kaiju, then use Super Poly on That

There are boards where you might actually need to do that with Radian or something. Remove something they equipped with that one equip spell that can negate Super Poly with Gamaciel, then go Mudragon of the Swamp.

[ChaosBahamut]

Originally posted by EXO:

Super Poly is fine, it depends too much on the format. Against decks like SwordSoul is not good, but once we get the rest of the Branded support, is going to become a staple.

Unless using fusion monsters with rather generic type/attribute fusion material requirements (Draconecro and Starving Venom come to mind) and cards that can force monsters on the field to qualify. (Zombie World and Lair of Darkness respectively, for these 2 instances)

[Soren]

Originally posted by ChaosBahamut:

Originally posted by EXO:

Super Poly is fine, it depends too much on the format. Against decks like SwordSoul is not good, but once we get the rest of the Branded support, is going to become a staple.

Unless using fusion monsters with rather generic type/attribute fusion material requirements (Draconecro and Starving Venom come to mind) and cards that can force monsters on the field to qualify. (Zombie World and Lair of Darkness respectively, for these 2 instances)

2 tuners is a requirement for one fusion, but the end result monster isn't very good. It's useful for just eliminating 2 boss tuners that omni-negate since super poly can't be negated or responded too.

[Judgmental Amaterasu]

To make it fair for OP all outs to anything in the game shall now be removed. Whoever gets their board set up first wins. Is that fair enough for you OP?

[Tunnel Sharks Rule!!!]

Super Poly is fair and balanced at 2

[Soren]

I love super poly from a play against perspective. It costs 2 resources (and and a hand discard), and takes a fair bit of room in your extra deck for various fusions. It's not that meta for this reason. I'd much rather play against a super poly user than I would against a guy who has an extra deck instead full of omni-negaters that are universal to all decks.

[AlluMan96]

It can be annoying, but honestly, I'd say it's just another trick to add to the pile. Getting Nibiru'd, getting your big boss Kaiju'd, having your combos stunted by Ash, Imperm, etc, of the millions of ways in which your opponent will break your board, getting Super Poly'd is just another thing to watch out for. Play it safe, keep your S/T removal close at hand, bait the bastard, sometimes even the most bleak of situations can be reversed by fishing for mistakes from your opponent.

To be fair, I have a biased perspective, because I abuse Super Poly liberally. I play Zombie World from time to time and Super Poly is one of their best outs to a board full of negates, just plink a few of them away and make yourself a Draconecro for some hard slaps of realiation.

However, I can sympathize with the frustration of having your monsters be used to make a monster on the opponent's side, like salt on an open wound. I've fought Albaz and I still don't know exactly how to feel about him. A searchable, recoverable Super Poly on legs is a little wacky, even with the restrictions it has. And before anyone states it, yeah, you can also use Super Poly from deck with Verte, but you don't need to tell me that Verte Anaconda was a mistake, I've been on that card's ass since the first time I laid eyes on that affront to god.

[electricwizard]

Super poly is fair in my opinion, sometimes it can win you games single-handedly but not all the time

[【𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙠】🧉]

yes

[ChaosBahamut]

Originally posted by DD AlluMan96:

To be fair, I have a biased perspective, because I abuse Super Poly liberally. I play Zombie World from time to time and Super Poly is one of their best outs to a board full of negates, just plink a few of them away and make yourself a Draconecro for some hard slaps of realiation.

Or Mad Eldlich if you have Eldlich out and they have a mid-high level zombie (be it converted to a zombie or originally a zombie, doesn't matter) and/or they take control of one of your Eldlich's. (or if you have Eldlich and a qualifying zombie on YOUR field; attack with as many of them as possible then Super Poly during the battle phase and get yet another attack, sometimes for game) And should the card you discard to activate it be Glow-Up Bloom... (thank god that has a "If... you can" effect, as opposed to a "When... you can" effect; can't miss the timing then)

[Rainy days.]

Originally posted by Big Bridge.mp4:

To make it fair for OP all outs to anything in the game shall now be removed. Whoever gets their board set up first wins. Is that fair enough for you OP?

So….. nothing is changed?