安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
討論區規矩與守則
6 
檢舉此篇文章
which have nothing to do with anything that took place after 1984
Jason is talking about the Stay puff event, and the ghostbusters involvement.. not historical events that didn't involved ghosts or ghost busters. All those other Gozer events were disasters not paranormal.
Doubtful because there was never a reference in the movies that there are two different cars. If there were two different cars then where was Ecto 1 at during Ghostbusters 2? Are you saying after being litigated by everyone that nearly put them out of business that they had a second location they were keeping Ecto 1 at? I doubt that and I also doubt that they would have built a second car and toss the original and not keep it as a back up.
As far as how did the team get there, we dont know, we do know that Winston is a rich businessman now and is keeping Ray`s Occult bookstore going even though its not turning a profit. For all we know the team was flown down there on Winston`s private jet. We do know that Egon didnt clean them out of everything, Egon only cleaned them out of all the ghost traps and he took his proton pack and Ecto 1. He didnt take their flight suits nor their proton packs so they would have still had them.
Not necessarily. Have to remember license plates changes every so often some as often as yearly some as little as every five years. There would be no reason for the Ecto 1A plate to still be on the car. Now as far as the original Ecto 1 plate goes, it could be as simple as that was the plate that was put on the car after they reverted from the come back scheme used on Ecto 1A.
In the end there are issues that dont make sense but the license plate issue is a minor small issue unlike proclaiming there were 2 Ecto`s. To say there were two it wouldnt make sense as we see at the beginning of the second movie that they were taken to court and litigated heavily. They wouldnt have had the funds to go out and purchase another hearse and rebuild it, it would have been more cost effective to rebuild what they already had. Like wise if they did purchase another hearse they wouldnt have kept the first one as they wouldnt have had a place to put it. They would have gutted everything they could and junk the hulk which wouldnt make sense either cause Ecto 1 was Ray's baby he wouldnt have done that to her. Even Winston has a soft spot for Ecto 1.
The license plate while its a small issue of being the original Ecto 1 plate instead of a newer post 1989 New York Ecto 1 plate can just simply be explained by having the original plate thrown back on the car after the fact. It was obvious the car wasnt being driven as it wasnt registered and the plates are out of state plates that are quite out dated. This is less of an issue how ever cause many people with old cars actually spend money on period plates to put on their vehicle.
Correct, we cant use the license plate as evidence of there being two cars. Two different cars makes no sense story wise and license plates can be kept and reused.
One could argue that Egon took Ecto 1 to the farm house back at the start of Ghostbusters 2 hence why we see Ecto 1A and why we never see the original car and there are two cars but then that would be crazy to think cause Ecto 1 was smoking and back firing at the start of Ghostbusters 2 yet in Afterlife if it was simply driven there and abandoned it wasnt smoking and back firing. Egon wasnt the mechanic of the team that was Ray so it just doesnt make sense any way you try to logically look at it.
I chalk the license plate up to just paying homage to us old fans of the original two films. I would have perfectly been fine with Ecto 1 having a newer New York plate that said Ecto 1 to be honest.
We will, the question is what will be the clarification. Will people accept the clarification or will they be like so many on social media that is complaining about it and not agreeing with it. If they come out and say there were two Ecto 1`s I will accept it and pray that it will make logical sense and not result in over thinking that aspect. That is my biggest concern is everything makes sense and sounds plausible vs forcing in aspects just for the sake of having them sort of like how the Back to the Future video game changed lore to bring back the time machine by claiming there were two time machines created in the first movie at the twin pines mall and that everything that happened in the first movie never happened for some weird reason. I dont want that for the Ghostbusters franchise but if they can make it sound legit I will accept it. They could say that Ray rebuilt Ecto 1 and they sent it out to start a franchise business in another state and I would accept that cause that makes logical sense if it was done at the time of Ghostbusters 2, wouldnt make sense after or before Ghsotbusters 2 based off established lore.
Stupidest debate ever
As Jason has backtracked on this, he has no choice but to claim there were two cars as it's now the only way to fix this mess. Afterlife SHOULD have included 1A, but as GB2 was not meant to be canon we got just ecto1. They were meant to be the same car. Jason got lazy on this. I glad his backtracking but it's created a bit of a mess.
Problem is Jason never has said that GB2 wasnt cannon, as I stated before pages ago there are numerous props from GB2 sitting around inside the farm house, if it was not to be canon then why would they waste time including so many GB2 easter eggs.
The fact is people run their mouths off like about something they know nothing about proclaiming all kinds of wild crazy myths as fact without a sliver of supporting evidence which then gets blown all out of proportion and results in the belief that it is factually true.
He wouldnt, just people proclaiming something as fact without a bit of supporting evidence. I bet the whole reason for that is because Afterlife is a direct sequel to Ghostbusters and not Ghostbusters 2 ignoring the fact that Afterlife is tying up the loose end from Ghostbusters which is that they didnt catch Gozer and Gozer could come back at any point in the future. Same with Vigo, Vigo wasnt captured either and he could come back at any point in the future as well. I hope that isnt their plan with the sequel to Afterlife but it very well could be a tying up of loose ends from Ghostbusters 2 and then we will start getting original content.
First of all Jason did say that in the commentary for the trailer, he explained why nobody remembers ghosts or the ghostbusters.. his explanation is that what happened in 1984 was an isolated paranormal event. this means it only happened once (no 89 event) and it also explained why nobody remembered the new years eve party when the statue of liberty when for a walk... sure i can accept a few ghosts in 84 getting forgotten about but not a massive statue which would have been filmed by news crews.. Plus all the archive YouTube footage in Afterlife only mentions Stay puff, even Podcast remembered Stay puff but he doesn't remember the stature ? (because originally it wasn't canon)
As for toasters blink and you'll miss it cameo.. these are Easter eggs, things playing homage to the past not being part of continuity (that's what an easter egg is) Films do this all the time they even did it on Answer the call. Rays book shop was originally just borrowed from GB2, (Jason talks about this too) just like the firehouse was borrowed for ATC. Ray even in his cameo talks about them running a business in the 80s which contradicts what GB2 tells us.
So there you go, The film tells us GB2 isn't canon, Jason pretty much says GB2 wasn't intended to be canon... but he has since changed his mind.. this is a good thing but lets accept that wasn't the original intent.