Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm saying they're both core mechanics for their combat gameplay, lol. I never disagreed Sekiro's was more balanced; I only made the point that just as Sekiro depends on the player to consistently use deflecting to defeat enemies so does Wo Long expect its players to use the parrying mechanic.
I'm not sure why this is getting you so riled up, lol. It's a simple concept. You can argue that Sekiro implements its core mechanic more thoughtfully and efficiently, but that still doesn't make it any less clear that parrying is a core mechanic in Wo Long.
Edit: I would also add that parrying is like a mix between the Nioh 2 Yokai Counter and the Sekiro deflect, considering the parry is spammable (unlike the yokai counter, which had lag, and similar to the Sekiro deflect), but an OP mechanic (like the yokai counter and unlike the Sekiro deflect).
The parry also functions similar to Sekiro where the intended use involves regular enemy attacks, while the yokai counter was focused explicitly on disrupting specific boss moves. To me it's like a hybrid between the two. Again, though, it's not well balanced, clearly.
Honestly, i started avoiding watching game reviews a few years ago, untill id finished them myself, they usually negatively impact your perception of things and detract from your own enjoyment, if you dont like the game, you are going to know, The game is great so far, not interested in hearing ACG's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ opinion on it, its on gamepass anyway.
See what you just described is exactly what i'm talking about, now you are going to go in to the game with the preconceived notion that the level design sucks, i've finished the first 4 levels and they were fine, I thoroughly enjoyed them, By watching someones review they project their post-50 hour play burn out on to you. I do agree that reviews can be helpful in certain situations but i just find for me they are a net-negative on my personal playthrough experience. I watch them all after i finish and see what everyone else thought.
Probably not how everyone works but that usually is the case for me.
So far I've been to a castle at night, a ravine and a bamboo forest. Seems varied and nice to me and some of the areas are quite lovely to look at no less.
Well reviews are by design completely subjective in most aspects. On PC, even takes on performance and optimization might be subjective because it could vary from person to person.
I tried to summarize each point into one sentence but messy is indeed a word he used throughout. You could watch the full review if interested but I don't think a person who has enjoyed the game will agree with many things he said.