Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
>decides to play Rise instead
Make it make sense
Meanwhile i have a I5 and a 1070TI and i can max out Rise/SB and see a lot of neat details in the monsters.
I thought it was quite clear, but I shall reiterate for you.
I was unimpressed with the visuals relative to the performance side of MH Wilds.
Meaning, you know, that the game doesn't look quite good enough to me on medium - low settings in comparison to say, MH World, to warrant the sort of performance it gets. I didn't say the game looked bad, but having to rely on upscaling to AND FG to get good performance?
World still looks incredible seven years later.
I'm not playing Rise because I think it looks better, I'm not just keen on RE Engine and the performance problems it brings when used in open worlds.
See Dragon's Dogma 2.
I haven't seen proper game play of Wilds yet. Does it truly look 10x worse than Rise? (Rise looks fine, just saying)
On a technical level, absolutely not. That's not what I meant. Sorry if my initial post came off that way.
Rise & Sunbreak look good.
World & Iceborne look amazing.
Wilds has the potential to look incredible, but is brought down by a reliance on upscaling and frame-generation.
On medium settings, I couldn't maintain 30fps at native 1080p as some scenes in the beta were simply too intensive for whatever reason. I had to rely on FSR / upscaling to get a consistent frame-rate, which blurred the image quality and if I want 60fps, I'm supposed to use Frame-Generation, which comes with issues when used below 60fps.
World on max settings, a seven year old game, looks much better to me than Wilds on medium settings does, save for the fur and character models. Everything else was unimpressive when you take the performance hit into account.
The reason I said I'm "sticking" with Rise, is due to not having played Sunbreak before, despite having bought it when it launched. I beat Rise on Switch before G Rank, wasn't impressed by it, re-bought it on Steam in anticipation for G Rank and to give it another go, just never got around to it.
I admit it is difficult to find other hunters to play with.
Complete beginner to MH franchise here, and honestly the multiplayer system is terrible.
I grind to RC 100 and maybe I'll buy the DLC, so if u want to play let me know.
I actually like the simpler graphics it gives me the old ps2boomer vibes but better looking.
I prepurchased Wilds just to be amongst the numbers who are signalling "I want this" but I doubt I will play much until the first DLC.
World was a different feel. It was like a huge vibe when it came out. Especially PC.
Wilds doesn't have that fervor atm.
Rise is the step child you leave in the basement with a box of magical treasure o's and a thing of chicken top ramen, yeah it exists but honestly no one notices.