安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
By the star system, he's supposedly weak to dragon.
But he's not. Alatreon spends almost no time in his base state where that's actually the case.
World's star system is trash.
Rise's system is missing information, but it's still more accurate.
The problem with the alatreon's chart is that Water should've been 3 starts to fire active mode and Thunder the same 3 stars to Ice active.
Dragon being 2 stars during dragon mode is exactly what it is
And, no, water should not be 3 star for fire active as it is does less than ice to fire mode.
Same goes for thunder vs ice mode.
The star system is crap. Actual charts are better, they're just incomplete.
Water/Thunder do slightly less damage than Ice/Fire respectively, you can reach the topple almost as fast
When you invert the elements (water against ice active and vice versa) you have a much harder time to reach the topple than dragon (1star-1star vs 1star-2stars)
So I think dragon 2 stars is accurate and water/thunder should've been 3 stars
Dragon does functionally nothing against either fire or ice active. Highest hzv for it in either state is a whopping two.
Except dragon ONLY works during the dragon state after the topple. Aka: The part of the fight you don't need element for. And even then, it's less damage than using ice/fire on the proper respective states.
It is otherwise useless.
i'm also one of those people who thought alatreon had some weakness to dragon element in mhw because of the book when he realistically doesn't, like at all, so agreeing with seamus here. mhw's book is weird in multiple areas, i vastly prefer rise's
Final boss weapons all have negative affinity and 80 purple so with a bad charm it can be hard to make them consistently good weapons.
So no, it's not useless.
https://i.imgur.com/1aWY1xe.png
It does barely more damage than elements that are actually useful during the rest of the fight.
Don't use dragon on alatreon. It's actively bad.
So any element, even no element, is superior to dragon, unless your dragon element is on a Fatalis weapon, then go ahead and smash that 85 raw hitzone head.
For the topic, I'm not sure honestly. MR Valfalk weapons are really easy to use and build for, and the difference compared to a blast or poison raw weapon would not be too big, especially in multiplayer where HP values are inflated. Compared to Gaismagorm's weapons on Valfalk, his own weapons might be similarly powerful, so it's just a matter of preference. I believe DB runs high raw weapons that have some element for when Valfalk isn't enraged, but it's really hard to judge how much that element is contributing towards your overall damage.
5min kill or 6mins. I don't care. I'm not showing off on youtube, nor do I care what others think. XD
QoL =3
Thou, few weapon types like DB or Bow, do I tend to lean towards right element. I tend to Lance/HBG Val, element doesn't really matter.
For instance, the final bosses' Greatsword is pretty good despite it's negative affinity. I've never taken into account the dragon element on it when using it.
let that sink in