Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes of course, otherwise DLSS wouldn't be available
On my end it's 15-30% less GPU Utilization, i'd take it if not for mentioned issues
I play on 90fps (only because game seems to be internally locked in some way to it despite having 120fps option) on 1440p resolution so id like me some better AA with that
I do have a raytracing reshade, and its very heavy. I was hoping dlss would help but nope, its worse.
I have a 3070 and 3060 laptops and 6800xt pc and for some reason in traversing location it drops from 120 to 90 in between zones, it gets back to 120 once you are in numbered zone and actually it's rock solid even when you fight a monster but those in between drops are really jarring, even VRR does not help with that, no noticable GPU or CPU spikes either, observing in since a PC realease actully but i just locked that game to 90 and that's good enough for me