Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Quaternary makes slightly more sense, but is still a far fetched idea.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun
Also ternary logic allows more range in operations. Binary logic is wastly more popular, because it more easy to use. And implement. But research show that ternary computers will be faster up to 50%. IBM is now thinkig about building experemintal ternary computer. Also i read some russian blogs, where people designed and ordered to manufacture in China some simple ternary microchops.
have link to one of them. (In russian) https://habr.com/ru/post/500612/
Even in optical computing, sticking to the binary "on/off" is far more reliable and consistent than trying to implement some in-between state.
And link to proposed trenary optical computer
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231006206_Ternary_Optical_Computer_Architecture
if you look here you can see fotos of oscilograf screen, where you can see three states.