Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- reasonable price
- high survivability
- ergonomics and handling(mostly inherited)
cons:
- vulnerability to critical damage
- small reserve and high fuel consumption
- guns of the main caliber have large blind spots
Verdict: although the vanilla design had its drawbacks, the modification in its current state does not have such advantages over it to replace it. Intuitively, it seems to me that the design can be balanced towards 130 mm guns. 180 mm single turrets are most effective as part of a battery of 4/6/8 guns. On smaller ships, they are impractical. You can work with the separation and protection of ammunition. If autocannons are added, most (and possibly all) of the IRCM can be removed.