Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Your mindset suggests that killers shouldn't have as much agency as survivors in match power, which is insane, because there are 3 killers to 4 survivors. Killers should have more personal power.
Go take a seat :)
They'll likely add more maps games like this usually do.
Yeah I never trust IGN reviews they seem to base reviews on who is paying the most. Funny how Triple A games always get glowing reviews no matter how much of a mess they are from IGN.
The "3 maps" at launch is indeed an issue, but only for people who will want to no-life the game and play it until their inevitable burn out.
Also, content wise, the comparisons to DBD need to stop. That game launched in such a sorry state with so little content and has had 7 years of updates... you cannot really expect any game to LAUNCH with as many maps and characters.
What I find interesting is that the reviewers cannot agree if the game is competetive or casual friendly. We know the devs stance on this, but it seems people were getting overwhelmed easily by being matched with stronger opposing teams. I smell some kind of matchmaking will have to be added at some point to avoid player retention due to frustration.
yeah, the argument that the game will be stale is hilarious. yet they'll go right back to the exact same dbd game they've been playing for 7 straight years