Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
His ENTIRE purpose is creating a wide berth for the victims to respect if they don't want to die easily. You disrespect it and then say there's no counterplay? Sounds like a skill issue and a half.
Sissy admittedly does need to be addressed, but she will be. The developers have confirmed that she's not supposed to poison you on every hit, and once that's gone she'll be a lot more bearable.
Johnny is easily the worst family member of the 5 so I don't really know what your problem is there.
And Connie IS OP - Cook can't place two padlocks on a single door, there can only be a max of two locks on a door - one by default and one padlock. And when some exits are as easy to achieve as two locks (Gas Station generator side exit), the ability to instantly break a lock is overpowered even in the face of raising that 2 to 3.
Sissy is currently bugged and will be fixed (soon byebye to her slow on poison attacks).
Why do you think Johnny needs a nerf? I think he's one of the most useless killer atm. He's only good if the victim doesn't know where to run...
It's a flawled and poor design choice who's ruining the whole game on different aspects for both killers and victims.
As it stands, an experienced party of victims can straight up bully Leatherface. Some people are legit reluctant to even play him.
The whole reasoning ISN'T "Can he do that?" but "Why doesn't he oneshots me?" period.
If the game wants me to make sure I can't survive that attack, I shouldn't be surviving that attack, there's literally 0 reasons to make me think I can fight back just to be stunlocked into the animation and then die.
If I didn't get oneshot it's because the game wants me to be able to fight back, if I can't fight back something is clearly wrong.
1 - His attack range is silly: his animation doesn't respect what he reaches with his attack. At first I thought it was me, then I watched others getting hit even he was very far from them.
2 - He's the only one (Sissy aside) who can keep up with his attacks until he kills you; if he gets you once he's going to slash you to death in 4 hits that lasts 1 second of running.
3 - He's the only one that could kill me even when I'm middle (literally halfway through, not just beginning) the animation of going around stuff; crawling, tight spaces etc, it doesn't happen with other killers.
I have 50 hours of surviving so far.
Like??? We're talking about the whole concept of Connie WASTED because Cook can double chain one exit. Do we even elaborate what we're saying?
If the game wants to me have a chance to survive I should AT LEAST be able to press my ability. Which I couldn't.
I don't mind the double tap or whatever you wanna call what's happening with Leatherface, I'm criticizing the design choice, because the fact that you can't get one tapped I think it's something developers didn't really look into, or else I wouldn't be stunlocked into animation to death, I would just die with that attack.
If you don't care about these kind of issues, which affects both sides, slaughters and victims, you don't really care about the game at all.