Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With this, the various future options for the game are being considered and discussed.
My assumption is, that production was constantly tough in terms of the financial success and that 1.0 marks a hit or miss moment.
Either it hits strong and earns enough to warrant more development, or it fails and you need to move on.
I get that, its still sad if it doesnt hit, because the game is good, delivers a lot of stuff and has still enough room to expand with really good stuff.
Multiplayer got me to buy a copy for a friend. I put my money where my mouth is. Said multiplayer would get me to recommend it to a friend and so i did.
It does seem like that as the launch discount is way too good, as every other game I bought increased it at launch and does a 10-20% discount. I haven't followed the early access and I'm glad it's finally out, but this gives me a hail mary vibe, I hope I'm wrong. I just want the campaign to be great as the one for They are Billions was an insane letdown
They have to fix it first. I would have refunded it but too late since I bought it when it was released in EA.
Going back to They are billions.