Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This meta needs to end asap. There is a reason why i play games from the early 2000's.
This is just an other MOBA trend chaser that tries to succeed in an already saturated market, it doesn't have anything that makes it stand out from the crowd, it's just a bad copy of Battleborn with a character design worse than Concord's.
>says games suck
Yeah I was just about to bring up battleborn and even though I did not play it a lot it was pretty unique at the time and as a non moba player it was fun for what it was, with its a own co-op campaign and everything.
The funny thing is that at that time people automatically wrote it off because it was a "overwatch copy" when in reality it was actually a first person Moba that was not very common at the time.
The same people that complained about Battleborn back in the day for being unoriginal will 100% buy into this game just because its a valve game and people like riding trends.
Man these modern PVP trendy games are so lame imo.
that being said, deadlock isn't really that fun either. Maybe they'll polish it up a bit and it'll be worth playing - it's giving me Paragon vibes which I did actually like