Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not technically futa as each character, except your succubus, has only one set of parts.
Your succubus can be a "real" futa though.
so no true futa/herm?
The way it works in game is that, NPCs will only have one set of genitals, you know because true hermaphroditism is not something that happens in humans, however you as a sucubus/incubus/etc. can choose to be a hermaphrodite/futa if you want (this is what I personally prefer to play) but you first have to unlock a specific tome in order to do it.
Now I personally would absolutely love it if the dev introduced intersex (which does occur in real life) as a variation of sexual partners, intersex is not quite the same thing as futa/hermphrodite (and you should avoid using such terms for intersex people, unless they explicitly state they identify with such a label, as it can be considered offensive), but it is a form of genital variation that does occur which could be considered somewhat similar, also LGBTQIA+ rep is based and we should have more of it.
I'm curious about what good intersex representation would look like in your opinion. (Not that I'm promising anything because I'm spread pretty thin as it is!)
Would it be an idealised representation where intersex characters can both top and bottom? Or more of a lucky dip where you might get somebody who could either top or bottom or neither? The player not knowing what their loadout should be might be interesting.
Well I'm not intersex myself so you should take my word with a grain of salt.
Still if I was to suggest something: so first of all the most likely candidate for intersex representation is ambiguous genitalia as it is externally visible, this can come in multiple variations so it would make sense to have it be a lucky dip of sorts with three types of outcomes:
1) while the genitals are atypical they still only function as male/female genitals, which would be a neutral pull, for example undescended testicles, in which case the penis would still only function as male genitalia, or lumps of tissue in the labia that resemble testicles, in which case the vagina would still only function as female genitalia.
2) the genitals have a limited ability to function as both, which would be a lucky pull, from what I can gather this could be represented by clitoromegaly albeit exaggerated to the point of the clitoris being enlarged enough for some penetrative capability, which as far as I can tell is not impossible but very atypical in cases of clitoromegaly.
3) the genitals are not properly developed enough to be capable of sexual function, this would be an unlucky pull.
Again, I am not intersex and my word should be taken with a grain of salt, this is something that would have to be given further discussion and my comment here was an offhanded statement.