Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I focused more on urbanism and organic growth, and not on traffic simulation, so the cars and pedestrians are just aesthetic.
Thank you for taking time to explain! That helps. Appreciate it! Agreed I love both Sim City and Transport Tycoon. Interesting no money? I wonder how that works... I suppose one way to find out right?! (heh) and...Just because you took your time to respond I am buying the game! ;-)
Cheers!
If you see society as a whole and self-sufficient or isolated (as Urbek is), money is meaningless on that scale. Since it has no one to sell or buy its things from, then even if Urbekites have money for their internal transactions, that amount of money does not matter for the success or failure of the society. What matters is only the resources (labour, materials and knowledge).
Thinking about other games, if the player controls only a few agents or one agent (empire or city hall), money does make sense.